↓ Skip to main content

Physiologic expansion of human heart-derived cells enhances therapeutic repair of injured myocardium

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiologic expansion of human heart-derived cells enhances therapeutic repair of injured myocardium
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13287-019-1418-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seth Mount, Pushpinder Kanda, Sandrine Parent, Saad Khan, Connor Michie, Liliana Davila, Vincent Chan, Ross A. Davies, Haissam Haddad, David Courtman, Duncan J. Stewart, Darryl R. Davis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,479,487
of 15,381,025 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#416
of 1,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,561
of 252,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,381,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them