You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Natural allelic variation underlying a major fitness trade-off in Arabidopsis thaliana
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature09083 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marco Todesco, Sureshkumar Balasubramanian, Tina T. Hu, M. Brian Traw, Matthew Horton, Petra Epple, Christine Kuhns, Sridevi Sureshkumar, Christopher Schwartz, Christa Lanz, Roosa A. E. Laitinen, Yu Huang, Joanne Chory, Volker Lipka, Justin O. Borevitz, Jeffery L. Dangl, Joy Bergelson, Magnus Nordborg, Detlef Weigel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Australia | 2 | 15% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 541 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 2% |
| Unknown | 500 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 149 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 144 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 42 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 76 | 14% |
| Unknown | 55 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 385 | 71% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 60 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | 3% |
| Unknown | 61 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,517,069
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#61,172
of 99,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,111
of 109,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#374
of 571 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 571 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.