@BidenHQ 4yrs ago a study used to discredit and attack doctors promoting hydroxychloroquine was later magically retracted https://t.co/JakmkbA0Na
@ShawnSmith1776 @nataliegwinters This Lancet? They were dragged naked through the streets before they retracted this study https://t.co/SM4VxprKiI
@amine_umlil @PascalPraud @CNEWS oui, enfin constater que l'article du Lancet https://t.co/f58ytedZRK était bidonné était à la portée de beaucoup de monde (même si faire une critique exhaustive de tous les bidonnages qu'il contenant exigeait plus de conna
@GiovenaleEmilio @jumpedsword @Antonel24480189 Scienziah del pisello 👇 https://t.co/RXrNU5v8Db
RT @Klaskow3: @Supt_Hoffman @dougducey This is the "retracted" Lancet report the Media used to make fun of Trumps suggested use of HCL a ye…
RT @Klaskow3: 41:00 mins into the video, A "FAKE" Peer review paper from Lancet, was published denouncing the use of Hydroxychloroquine.…
@JaneCaro @boring283745 https://t.co/fGqlYg7Rfu This was essentially fraud
RT @RefugeOfSinner5: Do you remember this Lancet study? Also May 2020. Now retracted. Who or what is Surgisphere? https://t.co/qpAeWw3z2M
RT @RefugeOfSinner5: Do you remember this Lancet study? Also May 2020. Now retracted. Who or what is Surgisphere? https://t.co/qpAeWw3z2M
@jonathanstea when major scientific journals are so corrupted to publish “evidence based study” that is completely fake just to be political, anecdotes are as good as evidence. to believe evidence-based is as pure as gold is as dsf. https://t.co/8I8Tov6
RT @RefugeOfSinner5: Do you remember this Lancet study? Also May 2020. Now retracted. Who or what is Surgisphere? https://t.co/qpAeWw3z2M
RT @RefugeOfSinner5: Do you remember this Lancet study? Also May 2020. Now retracted. Who or what is Surgisphere? https://t.co/qpAeWw3z2M
RT @RefugeOfSinner5: Do you remember this Lancet study? Also May 2020. Now retracted. Who or what is Surgisphere? https://t.co/qpAeWw3z2M
RT @RefugeOfSinner5: Do you remember this Lancet study? Also May 2020. Now retracted. Who or what is Surgisphere? https://t.co/qpAeWw3z2M
@Rosewind2007 @ag_feachaint_ Like this one?? Why else would they have falsified and stopped trials for therapeutics to use instead of an experimental mRNAshot?? Oh, because it was the only way to get immunity from damages under the EUA. Fuck you and your m
RT @RefugeOfSinner5: Do you remember this Lancet study? Also May 2020. Now retracted. Who or what is Surgisphere? https://t.co/qpAeWw3z2M
No credibility at all the Lancet. An advertising Rag for the Pharmaceutical industries and Gates.
RT @RefugeOfSinner5: Do you remember this Lancet study? Also May 2020. Now retracted. Who or what is Surgisphere? https://t.co/qpAeWw3z2M
Do you remember this Lancet study? Also May 2020. Now retracted. Who or what is Surgisphere? https://t.co/qpAeWw3z2M
RT @The_4th_Watch: @Jikkyleaks @TheLancet The Lancet has no credibility. https://t.co/x9ELlfxUHZ
@jonathanstea Do you mean like creating studies that were used to attack the credibility of doctors and then magically retracting it after they asked for the data? https://t.co/JakmkbzsXC
@jonathanstea Do you mean little creating studies that were used to attack credibility of doctors and then magically retracting it after they asked for the data? https://t.co/JakmkbzsXC
@BidenHQ Fake studied were created and then retracted after real doctors demanded their data. FJB and every scumbag democrat supporter https://t.co/JakmkbzsXC
@samuelkullmann @atomicc0805 @RainerVoegtlin Studie: Hydroxychloroquin erhöht Sterblichkeitsrate bei covid: https://t.co/l0sH3K472P
@TheLancet How much deaths caused by this one, published by a once reputable institution ? Totally invented data. #Lancetgate https://t.co/AOy1cdz6dO
RT @DschlopesIsBack: Posted by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko @ZelenkoZev on June 26th, 2021: The FDA betrayed the American people and 100000’s died…
@HallHurts : Why did @TheLancet RETRACT this HCQ ‘study’ in the spring of 2020 AND what impact did it have on the adoption of HCQ as a First Line Treatment for COVID-19 patients? @CartlandDavid https://t.co/qjFEV7ZgvT
@RealPatrickWebb @KingMakerFT @Nature @TheLancet Maybe this is why: how could they have published this????!!!!: https://t.co/xDERmYMeTy
@ColinDebunks After the fraud was laid bare, it turned out.. https://t.co/xmvm4RWuNu https://t.co/wa8Y3J6sLG
@redwondereroft1 @KIMMM107 @toobaffled Try the Hydroxychloroquine papers published in NEJM and Lancet and retracted almost immediately for starters. When those were first published was when I really knew something really really bad was going on. https:/
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @JikkyKjj: So who did? Who produced that huge amount of data - overnight - that [anons on the internet] proved to be fake? The answer i…
@texmed READ THE ROOM 👇
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
@MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the Lancet? They used every trick in the book against HCQ. The result? More people needlessly died. https://t.co/UIDgvKDqGC https://t.co/is1
RT @DarkiFranky: ☑️ L'Hydroxychloroquine 🔴 L'étude @TheLancet rétractée https://t.co/0ulBrRcLXn
RT @DarkiFranky: ☑️ L'Hydroxychloroquine 🔴 L'étude @TheLancet rétractée https://t.co/0ulBrRcLXn