The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 122 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Factors influencing the uptake and use of nicotine replacement therapy and e‐cigarettes in pregnant women who smoke: a qualitative evidence synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013629 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katarzyna Campbell, Thomas Coleman-Haynes, Katharine Bowker, Sue E Cooper, Sarah Connelly, Tim Coleman |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 9 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 6% |
| United States | 6 | 5% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 88 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 104 | 85% |
| Scientists | 10 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 288 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 9% |
| Researcher | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 39 | 14% |
| Unknown | 148 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 10% |
| Unknown | 163 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#466,128
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#817
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,673
of 426,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.