↓ Skip to main content

The effect of varying analytical methods on estimates of anti-malarial clinical efficacy

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of varying analytical methods on estimates of anti-malarial clinical efficacy
Published in
Malaria Journal, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-8-77
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wendy J Verret, Grant Dorsey, Francois Nosten, Ric N Price

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 3%
France 1 3%
South Africa 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Argentina 1 3%
Thailand 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 32 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Other 8 21%
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 10%
Chemistry 3 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 3 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#3,638,506
of 12,524,399 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,404
of 3,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,488
of 264,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,524,399 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them