↓ Skip to main content

The effect of varying analytical methods on estimates of anti-malarial clinical efficacy

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of varying analytical methods on estimates of anti-malarial clinical efficacy
Published in
Malaria Journal, April 2009
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-8-77
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wendy J Verret, Grant Dorsey, Francois Nosten, Ric N Price

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
France 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Thailand 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 39 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Other 8 18%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 9%
Chemistry 3 7%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,482,726
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,461
of 5,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,660
of 93,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.