↓ Skip to main content

Rapid Effects of Marine Reserves via Larval Dispersal

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid Effects of Marine Reserves via Larval Dispersal
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0004140
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Cudney-Bueno, Miguel F. Lavín, Silvio G. Marinone, Peter T. Raimondi, William W. Shaw

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 4%
Mexico 5 2%
Brazil 4 1%
Virgin Islands, U.S. 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 264 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 24%
Researcher 69 24%
Student > Master 43 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Professor 20 7%
Other 45 15%
Unknown 20 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 153 52%
Environmental Science 76 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 27 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,483,725
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#89,316
of 195,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,029
of 169,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#283
of 458 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 458 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.