↓ Skip to main content

Novel Mutations in ACVR1 Result in Atypical Features in Two Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Patients

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel Mutations in ACVR1 Result in Atypical Features in Two Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Patients
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0005005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirsten A. Petrie, Wen Hwa Lee, Alex N. Bullock, Jenny J. Pointon, Roger Smith, R. Graham G. Russell, Matthew A. Brown, B. Paul Wordsworth, James T. Triffitt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Master 8 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,803,389
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#67,320
of 198,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,164
of 93,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#173
of 497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.