You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Derivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from Its O55:H7 Precursor
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0008700 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zhemin Zhou, Xiaomin Li, Bin Liu, Lothar Beutin, Jianguo Xu, Yan Ren, Lu Feng, Ruiting Lan, Peter R. Reeves, Lei Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 108 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 27 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 21% |
Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 14% |
Unknown | 14 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 46% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
Engineering | 4 | 4% |
Other | 15 | 14% |
Unknown | 17 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,483,725
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#89,316
of 195,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,915
of 165,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#328
of 617 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 617 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.