You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Shearwater Foraging in the Southern Ocean: The Roles of Prey Availability and Winds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0010960 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ben Raymond, Scott A. Shaffer, Serguei Sokolov, Eric J. Woehler, Daniel P. Costa, Luke Einoder, Mark Hindell, Graham Hosie, Matt Pinkerton, Paul M. Sagar, Darren Scott, Adam Smith, David R. Thompson, Caitlin Vertigan, Henri Weimerskirch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 189 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 58 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 24 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 108 | 52% |
| Environmental Science | 43 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 33 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,171,071
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#85,384
of 195,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,223
of 96,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#342
of 686 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 686 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.