You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Calibrating Models in Economic Evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PharmacoEconomics, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2165/11584600-000000000-00000 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tazio Vanni, Jonathan Karnon, Jason Madan, Richard G. White, W. John Edmunds, Anna M. Foss, Rosa Legood |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 146 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 24% |
| Researcher | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 29 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 17% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 26 | 17% |
| Engineering | 14 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 20% |
| Unknown | 45 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,705,287
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#227
of 1,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,068
of 191,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#31
of 699 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 699 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.