↓ Skip to main content

Network-Assisted Investigation of Combined Causal Signals from Genome-Wide Association Studies in Schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Network-Assisted Investigation of Combined Causal Signals from Genome-Wide Association Studies in Schizophrenia
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002587
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peilin Jia, Lily Wang, Ayman H. Fanous, Carlos N. Pato, Todd L. Edwards, Zhongming Zhao

Abstract

With the recent success of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), a wealth of association data has been accomplished for more than 200 complex diseases/traits, proposing a strong demand for data integration and interpretation. A combinatory analysis of multiple GWAS datasets, or an integrative analysis of GWAS data and other high-throughput data, has been particularly promising. In this study, we proposed an integrative analysis framework of multiple GWAS datasets by overlaying association signals onto the protein-protein interaction network, and demonstrated it using schizophrenia datasets. Building on a dense module search algorithm, we first searched for significantly enriched subnetworks for schizophrenia in each single GWAS dataset and then implemented a discovery-evaluation strategy to identify module genes with consistent association signals. We validated the module genes in an independent dataset, and also examined them through meta-analysis of the related SNPs using multiple GWAS datasets. As a result, we identified 205 module genes with a joint effect significantly associated with schizophrenia; these module genes included a number of well-studied candidate genes such as DISC1, GNA12, GNA13, GNAI1, GPR17, and GRIN2B. Further functional analysis suggested these genes are involved in neuronal related processes. Additionally, meta-analysis found that 18 SNPs in 9 module genes had P(meta)<1 × 10⁻⁴, including the gene HLA-DQA1 located in the MHC region on chromosome 6, which was reported in previous studies using the largest cohort of schizophrenia patients to date. These results demonstrated our bi-directional network-based strategy is efficient for identifying disease-associated genes with modest signals in GWAS datasets. This approach can be applied to any other complex diseases/traits where multiple GWAS datasets are available.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 6%
France 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 124 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 9%
Student > Master 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 11%
Computer Science 9 6%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 21 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2012.
All research outputs
#3,863,277
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#3,291
of 9,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,733
of 178,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#31
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.