You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Screening Strategies for Tuberculosis Prevalence Surveys: The Value of Chest Radiography and Symptoms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0038691 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna H. van’t Hoog, Helen K. Meme, Kayla F. Laserson, Janet A. Agaya, Benson G. Muchiri, Willie A. Githui, Lazarus O. Odeny, Barbara J. Marston, Martien W. Borgdorff |
| Abstract |
We conducted a tuberculosis (TB) prevalence survey and evaluated the screening methods used in our survey, to assess if screening in TB prevalence surveys could be simplified, and to assess the accuracy of screening algorithms that may be applicable for active case finding. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Cambodia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 47% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 42 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,478,634
of 23,505,010 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#91,663
of 201,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,327
of 165,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,537
of 3,982 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,010 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,982 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.