The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
On the right track: placement of camera traps on roads improves detection of predators and shows non-target impacts of feral cat baiting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wildlife Research, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1071/wr19175 |
| Authors |
Michael L. Wysong, Gwenllian D. Iacona, Leonie E. Valentine, Keith Morris, Euan G. Ritchie |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 31% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 7% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 52% |
| Scientists | 11 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 25 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,534,445
of 25,931,626 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Research
#146
of 1,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,476
of 430,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Research
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,931,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.