↓ Skip to main content

‘Willy nilly’ doctors, bad patients, and resistant bodies in general public explanations of antimicrobial resistance

Overview of attention for article published in Sociology of Health & Illness, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
‘Willy nilly’ doctors, bad patients, and resistant bodies in general public explanations of antimicrobial resistance
Published in
Sociology of Health & Illness, May 2020
DOI 10.1111/1467-9566.13111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark D. M. Davis, Davina B. Lohm, Andrea Whittaker, Paul Flowers

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,714,863
of 15,329,642 outputs
Outputs from Sociology of Health & Illness
#513
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,362
of 224,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociology of Health & Illness
#14
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,329,642 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.