↓ Skip to main content

Non-nutritive sweeteners for diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
47 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-nutritive sweeteners for diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012885.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Szimonetta Lohner, Daniela Kuellenberg de Gaudry, Ingrid Toews, Tamas Ferenci, Joerg J Meerpohl

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2020.
All research outputs
#800,454
of 15,550,579 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,243
of 11,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,672
of 281,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,550,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.