↓ Skip to main content

Non-nutritive sweeteners for diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
55 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-nutritive sweeteners for diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012885.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Szimonetta Lohner, Daniela Kuellenberg de Gaudry, Ingrid Toews, Tamas Ferenci, Joerg J Meerpohl

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 290 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 16%
Student > Bachelor 41 14%
Researcher 23 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 116 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 11%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Psychology 7 2%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 131 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,057,975
of 22,459,507 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,411
of 12,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,334
of 308,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,459,507 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.