You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of Mavacamten in Symptomatic Patients With Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.064 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolyn Y. Ho, Matthew E. Mealiffe, Richard G. Bach, Mondira Bhattacharya, Lubna Choudhury, Jay M. Edelberg, Sheila M. Hegde, Daniel Jacoby, Neal K. Lakdawala, Steven J. Lester, Yanfei Ma, Ali J. Marian, Sherif F. Nagueh, Anjali Owens, Florian Rader, Sara Saberi, Amy J. Sehnert, Mark V. Sherrid, Scott D. Solomon, Andrew Wang, Omar Wever-Pinzon, Timothy C. Wong, Stephen B. Heitner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 231 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 44 | 19% |
| Spain | 17 | 7% |
| Mexico | 10 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 4% |
| Colombia | 7 | 3% |
| Argentina | 7 | 3% |
| India | 6 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 2% |
| Turkey | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 36 | 16% |
| Unknown | 88 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 160 | 69% |
| Scientists | 32 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 29 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 233 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 15% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 17% |
| Unknown | 79 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 34% |
| Unspecified | 23 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 81 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 165. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#251,775
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#572
of 16,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,422
of 434,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#16
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.