You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of a Workplace Wellness Program on Employee Health, Health Beliefs, and Medical Use
|
---|---|
Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1321 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julian Reif, David Chan, Damon Jones, Laura Payne, David Molitor |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 114 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 48 | 42% |
Canada | 6 | 5% |
Ireland | 5 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Uganda | 1 | <1% |
Serbia | 1 | <1% |
Djibouti | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Unknown | 40 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 68 | 60% |
Scientists | 27 | 24% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 179 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
Researcher | 13 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
Other | 29 | 16% |
Unknown | 83 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 12% |
Psychology | 8 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
Engineering | 5 | 3% |
Other | 18 | 10% |
Unknown | 90 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 268. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#127,265
of 24,500,598 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#719
of 5,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,312
of 403,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#16
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,500,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 162.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.