The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Value of Preseason Screening for Injury Prediction: The Development and Internal Validation of a Multivariable Prognostic Model to Predict Indirect Muscle Injury Risk in Elite Football (Soccer) Players
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sports Medicine - Open, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40798-020-00249-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tom Hughes, Richard D. Riley, Michael J. Callaghan, Jamie C. Sergeant |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 26 | 34% |
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Belgium | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Latvia | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 54 | 71% |
| Scientists | 15 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 25 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 51 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2022.
All research outputs
#745,882
of 26,105,177 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine - Open
#69
of 643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,552
of 432,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine - Open
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,105,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.