You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of training methods for delivery of evidence-based psychotherapies: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-020-00998-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen Valenstein-Mah, Nancy Greer, Lauren McKenzie, Lucas Hansen, Thad Q. Strom, Shannon Wiltsey Stirman, Timothy J. Wilt, Shannon M. Kehle-Forbes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 52% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 12 | 48% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 39 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 35 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,163,278
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#416
of 1,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,683
of 430,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.