↓ Skip to main content

Factors affecting collaboration between general practitioners and community pharmacists: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors affecting collaboration between general practitioners and community pharmacists: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Rubio-Valera, Anna Maria Jové, Carmel M Hughes, Mireia Guillen-Solà, Marta Rovira, Ana Fernández

Abstract

Although general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists (CPs) are encouraged to collaborate, a true collaborative relationship does not exist between them. Our objective was to identify and analyze factors affecting GP-CP collaboration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 124 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 21%
Student > Master 26 20%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 27 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 26 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2012.
All research outputs
#12,856,791
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,270
of 7,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,183
of 164,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#62
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.