You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity Finds the Start of Repeating Patterns in Continuous Spike Trains
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0001377 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Timothée Masquelier, Rudy Guyonneau, Simon J. Thorpe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Israel | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 2% |
| France | 8 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 2% |
| Germany | 6 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 321 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 90 | 25% |
| Researcher | 86 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 58 | 16% |
| Unknown | 47 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 68 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 57 | 16% |
| Engineering | 53 | 15% |
| Psychology | 28 | 8% |
| Other | 43 | 12% |
| Unknown | 51 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,763,660
of 24,077,033 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#70,162
of 206,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,435
of 162,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#82
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,077,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.