You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How to use and assess qualitative research methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurological Research and Practice, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Loraine Busetto, Wolfgang Wick, Christoph Gumbinger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 21% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Kenya | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Thailand | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 34 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 63% |
| Scientists | 21 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3135 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 393 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 266 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 215 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 129 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 110 | 4% |
| Other | 344 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1678 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 211 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 209 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 191 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 123 | 4% |
| Engineering | 93 | 3% |
| Other | 568 | 18% |
| Unknown | 1740 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#470,168
of 24,882,360 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Research and Practice
#5
of 219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,259
of 400,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Research and Practice
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,882,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.