↓ Skip to main content

How to use and assess qualitative research methods

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Research and Practice, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 172)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
78 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1448 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to use and assess qualitative research methods
Published in
Neurological Research and Practice, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Loraine Busetto, Wolfgang Wick, Christoph Gumbinger

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1448 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 233 16%
Student > Bachelor 136 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 119 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 66 5%
Student > Postgraduate 64 4%
Other 207 14%
Unknown 623 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 122 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 120 8%
Social Sciences 117 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 61 4%
Unspecified 55 4%
Other 321 22%
Unknown 652 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2022.
All research outputs
#630,626
of 22,158,490 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Research and Practice
#5
of 172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,605
of 307,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Research and Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,158,490 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them