↓ Skip to main content

Report of Partial findings from the National Toxicology Program Carcinogenesis Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation in Hsd: Sprague Dawley® SD rats (Whole Body Exposure)

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 23,692)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
260 news outlets
blogs
29 blogs
twitter
556 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
90 Facebook pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users
video
1 video uploader

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Report of Partial findings from the National Toxicology Program Carcinogenesis Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation in Hsd: Sprague Dawley® SD rats (Whole Body Exposure)
Published in
bioRxiv, May 2016
DOI 10.1101/055699
Authors

Michael Wyde, Mark Cesta, Chad Blystone, Susan Elmore, Paul Foster, Michelle Hooth, Grace Kissling, David Malarkey, Robert Sills, Matthew Stout, Nigel Walker, Kristine Witt, Mary Wolfe, John Bucher

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 556 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 56 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 22%
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Other 19 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 21%
Engineering 12 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Environmental Science 5 8%
Unspecified 5 8%
Other 22 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2666. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2018.
All research outputs
#198
of 9,712,127 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#1
of 23,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12
of 277,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#1
of 1,143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,712,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.