↓ Skip to main content

Report of Partial findings from the National Toxicology Program Carcinogenesis Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation in Hsd: Sprague Dawley® SD rats (Whole Body Exposures)

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 59,864)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Report of Partial findings from the National Toxicology Program Carcinogenesis Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation in Hsd: Sprague Dawley® SD rats (Whole Body Exposures)
Published in
bioRxiv
DOI 10.1101/055699
Authors

Wyde, Michael, Cesta, Mark, Blystone, Chad, Elmore, Susan, Foster, Paul, Hooth, Michelle, Kissling, Grace, Malarkey, David, Sills, Robert, Stout, Matthew, Walker, Nigel, Witt, Kristine, Wolfe, Mary, Bucher, John

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 611 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 97 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 23%
Student > Bachelor 21 20%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 30 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 18%
Engineering 18 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Unspecified 7 7%
Other 39 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2773. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2019.
All research outputs
#335
of 13,533,624 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#1
of 59,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11
of 264,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#1
of 1,143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,533,624 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.