| Title |
Ethnic and socioeconomic differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection: prospective cohort study using UK Biobank
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-020-01640-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire L. Niedzwiedz, Catherine A. O’Donnell, Bhautesh Dinesh Jani, Evangelia Demou, Frederick K. Ho, Carlos Celis-Morales, Barbara I. Nicholl, Frances S. Mair, Paul Welsh, Naveed Sattar, Jill P. Pell, S. Vittal Katikireddi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 40 | 58% |
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 55% |
| Scientists | 19 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 458 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 458 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 68 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 63 | 14% |
| Unknown | 150 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 89 | 19% |
| Unknown | 173 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 192. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#211,376
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#182
of 4,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,129
of 432,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#4
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.