↓ Skip to main content

Functional electrical stimulation therapy for restoration of motor function after spinal cord injury and stroke: a review

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional electrical stimulation therapy for restoration of motor function after spinal cord injury and stroke: a review
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12938-020-00773-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cesar Marquez-Chin, Milos R. Popovic

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#9,770,790
of 15,936,688 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#298
of 663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,488
of 292,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,936,688 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 663 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them