↓ Skip to main content

Getting it right: Canadian intelligence assessments on Iraq, 2002-2003

Overview of attention for article published in Intelligence and National Security, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 562)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
twitter
163 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
4 Redditors
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Getting it right: Canadian intelligence assessments on Iraq, 2002-2003
Published in
Intelligence and National Security, May 2020
DOI 10.1080/02684527.2020.1771934
Authors

Barnes, Alan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 163 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 297. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2020.
All research outputs
#54,498
of 15,892,092 outputs
Outputs from Intelligence and National Security
#2
of 562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,755
of 291,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intelligence and National Security
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,892,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.