You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Inter-Rater Reliability of the Feline Grimace Scale in Cats Undergoing Dental Extractions
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, May 2020
Ryota Watanabe, Graeme M. Doodnaught, Marina C. Evangelista, Beatriz P. Monteiro, Hélène L. M. Ruel, Paulo V. Steagall
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||5||63%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||25%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||8||11%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||6||9%|
|Student > Postgraduate||4||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||24||34%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||5||7%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||2||3%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2023.
All research outputs
of 23,849,241 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
of 6,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 399,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,241 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.