↓ Skip to main content

Statistical analyses and quality of individual participant data network meta-analyses were suboptimal: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistical analyses and quality of individual participant data network meta-analyses were suboptimal: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Medicine, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12916-020-01591-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ya Gao, Shuzhen Shi, Muyang Li, Xinyue Luo, Ming Liu, Kelu Yang, Junhua Zhang, Fujian Song, Jinhui Tian

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Decision Sciences 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Psychology 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2020.
All research outputs
#18,726,447
of 23,211,181 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#3,259
of 3,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,619
of 397,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#103
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,211,181 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.