@Paul_1_9_7_4 I'm afraid that's all incorrect. https://t.co/F2DEn5NMOO
@MattBlackhawk @saintamourmi @CNN Here is a study on mask wearing. https://t.co/3cTeVpPF5f
35:06 Ivor labels this study https://t.co/ihD5zzma6w an 'associational' study. That isn't a term for study design. Data can be observational or interventional. It's an observational meta-analysis, literally 'decades of science' (since 2003), in the Lance
RT @profshanecrotty: 13/ One excellent new summary of the scientific and medical literature is: https://t.co/DssXRinlRD . Or if you prefer…
@Whreq @Gielah @JackMarsman Vertel mij wat, haha! https://t.co/Qvb5cFftNl
Dialogue avec le pharmacien: - pourquoi ne portez vous pas de masque? -ça ne sert à rien -?!!!, C'est utile ( https://t.co/cFrjb4gm9r) et c'est obligatoire (https://t.co/XKWax0A8Tf) - c'est mon opinion - Lisez l'étude du Lancet - L'expert qui conseille Mac
@ZubyMusic Ignore politics, follow science.. https://t.co/wSzgz9Zmqp
@Bogus_Sting @joel_alex_ @excessnearfalls @CNN Why do you present me with such investigations for the cold and the flu when the same investigations exist for the disease we are talking about, COVID? https://t.co/r4PhjS65LN
@IrishguardShaw @DrAdrianHeald https://t.co/ZBbZ6cTukV Glen see if this article comes up for you.
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
@dunmorej @page_eco @CiaranMcNulty Most scientific articles show that masks do work. Here's an example of a meta analysis of 172 studies https://t.co/UKTv2aqa6k
RT @juniordrblog: 16:37 Ah. Masks. Ivor claims there is no evidence they prevent infection, quoting analysis of randomized controlled tria…
@zagozdzon @bfialek Poczytaj sobie tez inne metaanalizy randomizowane ,których jest sporo np https://t.co/62679ijWpg
RT @_emmanuel___: @saraart4 @decodeurs @lemondefr oui pas bête tiens https://t.co/HJyOLvYjRc
@Readingbeauty3 @iammix24 Face masks are effective against SARS-CoV- 2 respiratory droplet transmission. Judy is a charlatan with no public health background. See the evidence. "Face mask use could result in a large reduction in risk of infection" https://
@metricalsystem @CarlvKeirsbilck @LievenAnnemans Mogelijks deze: https://t.co/25wIDsVPM5
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
Note the study was funded by WHO and the study admits "The primary limitation of our study is that all studies were non-randomised, not always fully adjusted, and might suffer from recall and measurement bias."
@BamaCrazy1 @MarkChangizi @carlheneghan Here is a proper published research article. https://t.co/ECwPohTaiC https://t.co/g5wLgy7RMR
@MarkChangizi @BamaCrazy1 @carlheneghan And there are many contrary ones from multiple respected authors -- instead of one outlier. https://t.co/pbV6oqlObP
RT @StaceyFitzgibb1: @WayzataMom2 @WhimsicalAf @ConservBlue2020 Here is a large systematic analysis published by Lancet. This IS the scien…
RT @StevenLShafer: A systematic review in @TheLancet identified the person-to-person risk reduction for distancing, face masks, and eye pro…
@GeraldKutney @WBrettWilson Back to the Dark Side, young Padawan? Executive dysfunction raising it's ugly head again Brett? Here's the science, in case you ever actually give a damn: https://t.co/rbYBC9JEX7
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
@missustruth @SVNewsAlerts Face mask use could result in a large reduction in risk of infection, with stronger associations with N95 or similar respirators compared with disposable surgical masks or similar https://t.co/C9VIOUmuEA
RT @StevenLShafer: A systematic review in @TheLancet identified the person-to-person risk reduction for distancing, face masks, and eye pro…
@WhimsicalAf @CJDeR53 @ConservBlue2020 Here is the science: a study of all the peer reviewed studies on masks, social distancing etc. published in Lancet. https://t.co/4P2VjsAMsB. Masks work!
@BruceWStanley And here is a metaanalysis from Lancet https://t.co/8fSzeQiOdU "Face mask use could result in a large reduction in risk of infection [..], with stronger associations with N95 or similar respirators compared with disposable surgical masks or
@RSewell1980 @lilydawn526 @WhimsicalAf @ConservBlue2020 The point here is that without the mask, everything else is for naught. Masks, social distancing, hand washing, testing, contact tracing and quarantining work together, and only together. Here’s the
@noblesseobleezy @Alex_Reynard @vaiyt @findingvinay @atrupar @mlipsitch Its from your study. The one you just tweeted. Distancing (~1-2 meters), masks and eye protection are approximately equal mitigation measures, at about -7.7% to -14.3% reduction, wit
@WayzataMom2 @WhimsicalAf @ConservBlue2020 Here is a large systematic analysis published by Lancet. This IS the science: https://t.co/4P2VjsAMsB. Please read and commit to wearing a mask so this will end.
RT @StevenLShafer: A systematic review in @TheLancet identified the person-to-person risk reduction for distancing, face masks, and eye pro…
@saraart4 @decodeurs @lemondefr oui pas bête tiens https://t.co/HJyOLvYjRc
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
@stuart0415 @cryptokeeper198 @RMaltese3 @LikeTheMountain Aww damn, thats on me. Tried to copy the links from my other post and Twitter cuts them off. Apologies https://t.co/D944hOTMEB https://t.co/euTCuF4Jp2 https://t.co/sHcMFImpMP https://t.co/9ohht
A systematic review in @TheLancet identified the person-to-person risk reduction for distancing, face masks, and eye protection (e.g., face shields). Each reduces the risk of transmission by about 2/3rds. https://t.co/NASXkjTSb9
RT @mlalanda: @Nopanaden @JAMAOphth Hace ya semanas que @TheLancet hablaba de protección ocular y sorprendentemente nadie lo está teniendo…
RT @mlalanda: Cómo evitar el contagio por coronavirus Resumen gráfico de artículo en @TheLancet https://t.co/NTDV8jMSTU https://t.co/tldj…
Just in case you need to be reminded: face masks work https://t.co/KHgZp2ytOM
RT @mlalanda: @Nopanaden @JAMAOphth Hace ya semanas que @TheLancet hablaba de protección ocular y sorprendentemente nadie lo está teniendo…
@LikeTheMountain 💯 Yes. There’s some social inconvenience in group settings but ultimately studies show masks “result in a large reduction in risk of infection, with stronger associations with N95 or similar respirators compared with disposable surgical ma
@besserwissi @NGegenrechts @jsprondel @BatschkappMZ @Markus_Soeder https://t.co/1KbfSq46G0 Face mask use could result in a large reduction in risk of infection (n=2647; aOR 0·15, 95% CI 0·07 to 0·34, RD −14·3%, −15·9 to −10·7; low certainty)
@efreshwater5 @that70stess @BJ8912 @LikeTheMountain @cindysun1414 @ConservBlue2020 here’s another study for you. 178 studies in 16 countries to reach this conclusion. https://t.co/m8AN021QmR
@rlamartini @kreckerlang @GuavaJellyNews @11thHour @Liz_Llorente @MichaelSteele Except for these studies: https://t.co/aWg4QeLz2R And: https://t.co/TxyaiMKw9k And: https://t.co/Al1YPkN7ov Meta study on respiratory virus transmission (including #SARSCoV2)
RT @mlalanda: @Nopanaden @JAMAOphth Hace ya semanas que @TheLancet hablaba de protección ocular y sorprendentemente nadie lo está teniendo…
@Jagster20548365 @lsilbers @oldschoolradic1 @LikeTheMountain Correlation does not equal causation https://t.co/PHwMmNfvVJ… https://t.co/gzUYd4bdGk… https://t.co/qTo89V6Rc2… https://t.co/HQAdD6ieYw https://t.co/MCUctYB4aO… https://t.co/RJtoVW35mM… ht
@CB_DT1986 I'm assuming you're mistakenly asserting masks don't prevent COVID. Here are multiple studies contradicting that view: https://t.co/Uae71uvYFB https://t.co/MNgLYGROcf https://t.co/86DlOOvzDk https://t.co/ltN2oPZPoz Do you have any science that s
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jarharpar: Journalists should write about the inaccuracies in the slides -- and be categorical that they're wrong! Using misleading inf…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
@Vaclav5599 @MNateShyamalan @ronnui_ @gummibear737 @AlexBerenson @EthicalSkeptic @Hold2LLC There have been at least a dozen studies from around the world specific to COVID since the pandemic started and they have overwhelmingly shown that masks make a huge
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @mlalanda: @Nopanaden @JAMAOphth Hace ya semanas que @TheLancet hablaba de protección ocular y sorprendentemente nadie lo está teniendo…
@CapnBradnPearl @DanForestNC WHO meta analysis of 172 different studies from 2020 vis a vis Covid 19 (N95’s obviously most effective) - https://t.co/kUqRSvIW1f
RT @mlalanda: Cómo evitar el contagio por coronavirus Resumen gráfico de artículo en @TheLancet https://t.co/NTDV8jMSTU https://t.co/tldj…
RT @mlalanda: @Nopanaden @JAMAOphth Hace ya semanas que @TheLancet hablaba de protección ocular y sorprendentemente nadie lo está teniendo…
@Nopanaden @JAMAOphth Hace ya semanas que @TheLancet hablaba de protección ocular y sorprendentemente nadie lo está teniendo en cuenta Me alegra mucho ver ese estudio del @JAMA_current que va en la misma linea. El estudio de @Sociedad_SEMI no recogieron e
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
@Jimmy15605649 @StephanieRuff3 @GeriCauac @RexChapman I'll post again, then: https://t.co/NkD2H0msio https://t.co/RKEXzgZOIX
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @pbreit: @Jwm55McKenzie @JoseAlbertoConc @AlexBerenson @IngrahamAngle Here's a mountain (87 citations): https://t.co/RVg55L2uP9
RT @PatriciaHeyn: Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19:…
@Koiler This paper is more recent. https://t.co/s6IjI7rN6h
@Benadam2019 @AssafChriqui @therealdanmano די נו אתה לא אמיתי https://t.co/Q9QrgpiOPU
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
@LisaFrideborg @bryonyLu @JanmWright Apart from the empirical evidence that actually exists? https://t.co/ym8Jasfkg3
Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis | The Lancet #coronavirus #COVID19 https://t.co/PSgVk7fEXi
@davis_bradley1 @Kevin10TV @10TV Oh, and this one too: "Optimum use of face masks, respirators, and eye protection in public and health-care settings should be informed by these findings and contextual factors." https://t.co/zO0PcPeoEE
16:37 Le mascherine. C. afferma che non c'é nessuna evidenza che proteggano dall'infezione e cita un'analisi di trials clinici randomizzati. Ci sono varie meta-analisi sulle mascherine dove emerge che SONO EFFICACI. https://t.co/wgJieUMdI2 48/x
RT @juniordrblog: 16:37 Ah. Masks. Ivor claims there is no evidence they prevent infection, quoting analysis of randomized controlled tria…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…