RT @mlalanda: Cómo evitar el contagio por coronavirus Resumen gráfico de artículo en @TheLancet https://t.co/NTDV8jMSTU https://t.co/tldj…
Just in case you need to be reminded: face masks work https://t.co/KHgZp2ytOM
RT @mlalanda: @Nopanaden @JAMAOphth Hace ya semanas que @TheLancet hablaba de protección ocular y sorprendentemente nadie lo está teniendo…
@LikeTheMountain 💯 Yes. There’s some social inconvenience in group settings but ultimately studies show masks “result in a large reduction in risk of infection, with stronger associations with N95 or similar respirators compared with disposable surgical ma
@besserwissi @NGegenrechts @jsprondel @BatschkappMZ @Markus_Soeder https://t.co/1KbfSq46G0 Face mask use could result in a large reduction in risk of infection (n=2647; aOR 0·15, 95% CI 0·07 to 0·34, RD −14·3%, −15·9 to −10·7; low certainty)
@efreshwater5 @that70stess @BJ8912 @LikeTheMountain @cindysun1414 @ConservBlue2020 here’s another study for you. 178 studies in 16 countries to reach this conclusion. https://t.co/m8AN021QmR
@rlamartini @kreckerlang @GuavaJellyNews @11thHour @Liz_Llorente @MichaelSteele Except for these studies: https://t.co/aWg4QeLz2R And: https://t.co/TxyaiMKw9k And: https://t.co/Al1YPkN7ov Meta study on respiratory virus transmission (including #SARSCoV2)
RT @mlalanda: @Nopanaden @JAMAOphth Hace ya semanas que @TheLancet hablaba de protección ocular y sorprendentemente nadie lo está teniendo…
@Jagster20548365 @lsilbers @oldschoolradic1 @LikeTheMountain Correlation does not equal causation https://t.co/PHwMmNfvVJ… https://t.co/gzUYd4bdGk… https://t.co/qTo89V6Rc2… https://t.co/HQAdD6ieYw https://t.co/MCUctYB4aO… https://t.co/RJtoVW35mM… ht
@CB_DT1986 I'm assuming you're mistakenly asserting masks don't prevent COVID. Here are multiple studies contradicting that view: https://t.co/Uae71uvYFB https://t.co/MNgLYGROcf https://t.co/86DlOOvzDk https://t.co/ltN2oPZPoz Do you have any science that s
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jarharpar: Journalists should write about the inaccuracies in the slides -- and be categorical that they're wrong! Using misleading inf…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
@Vaclav5599 @MNateShyamalan @ronnui_ @gummibear737 @AlexBerenson @EthicalSkeptic @Hold2LLC There have been at least a dozen studies from around the world specific to COVID since the pandemic started and they have overwhelmingly shown that masks make a huge
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @mlalanda: @Nopanaden @JAMAOphth Hace ya semanas que @TheLancet hablaba de protección ocular y sorprendentemente nadie lo está teniendo…
@CapnBradnPearl @DanForestNC WHO meta analysis of 172 different studies from 2020 vis a vis Covid 19 (N95’s obviously most effective) - https://t.co/kUqRSvIW1f
RT @mlalanda: Cómo evitar el contagio por coronavirus Resumen gráfico de artículo en @TheLancet https://t.co/NTDV8jMSTU https://t.co/tldj…
RT @mlalanda: @Nopanaden @JAMAOphth Hace ya semanas que @TheLancet hablaba de protección ocular y sorprendentemente nadie lo está teniendo…
@Nopanaden @JAMAOphth Hace ya semanas que @TheLancet hablaba de protección ocular y sorprendentemente nadie lo está teniendo en cuenta Me alegra mucho ver ese estudio del @JAMA_current que va en la misma linea. El estudio de @Sociedad_SEMI no recogieron e
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
@Jimmy15605649 @StephanieRuff3 @GeriCauac @RexChapman I'll post again, then: https://t.co/NkD2H0msio https://t.co/RKEXzgZOIX
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @pbreit: @Jwm55McKenzie @JoseAlbertoConc @AlexBerenson @IngrahamAngle Here's a mountain (87 citations): https://t.co/RVg55L2uP9
RT @PatriciaHeyn: Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19:…
@Koiler This paper is more recent. https://t.co/s6IjI7rN6h
@Benadam2019 @AssafChriqui @therealdanmano די נו אתה לא אמיתי https://t.co/Q9QrgpiOPU
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
@LisaFrideborg @bryonyLu @JanmWright Apart from the empirical evidence that actually exists? https://t.co/ym8Jasfkg3
Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis | The Lancet #coronavirus #COVID19 https://t.co/PSgVk7fEXi
@davis_bradley1 @Kevin10TV @10TV Oh, and this one too: "Optimum use of face masks, respirators, and eye protection in public and health-care settings should be informed by these findings and contextual factors." https://t.co/zO0PcPeoEE
16:37 Le mascherine. C. afferma che non c'é nessuna evidenza che proteggano dall'infezione e cita un'analisi di trials clinici randomizzati. Ci sono varie meta-analisi sulle mascherine dove emerge che SONO EFFICACI. https://t.co/wgJieUMdI2 48/x
RT @juniordrblog: 16:37 Ah. Masks. Ivor claims there is no evidence they prevent infection, quoting analysis of randomized controlled tria…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
@AnonsSynonymous @realDonaldTrump AnonsSynonymous ran away like a scared little girl that we knew he was and little coward blocked us cause he can't handle we called him on his B.S. about masks what a big loser haha! https://t.co/7IpUG8SfE4
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @juniordrblog: 16:37 Ah. Masks. Ivor claims there is no evidence they prevent infection, quoting analysis of randomized controlled tria…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
ooooooh Philippine Star yall need to read shit first before posting such misleading and irresponsible content
@Jwm55McKenzie @JoseAlbertoConc @AlexBerenson @IngrahamAngle Here's a mountain (87 citations): https://t.co/RVg55L2uP9
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
RT @jasonhaw_: Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combinatio…
Fact check: this is epidemiological bullshit. Nowhere in the Lancet study did (1) the authors used that specific combination and (2) what they said about physical distancing was that 2m was ideal. https://t.co/lT1DjacXtg
RT @PatriciaHeyn: Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19:…
RT @PatriciaHeyn: Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19:…
Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis - ScienceDirect https://t.co/GKRsk4Bzra
@bobcat_ready @ufmasters @thebradfordfile @realDonaldTrump Are you still bleating on...? Oh dear Bob... you’re a lost cause... and you didn’t answer my question... Mask makers have a disclaimer because Americans will sue over anything... Here you go... a
@BrianDotWalker Bull shit. Stop spreading that nonsense. Meta-analysis of 172 studies across multiple countries say they minimize risk. You go find 173 that say they don't and maybe I'll listen to your fuckery. https://t.co/10szWPt4wx
RT @EdDarrell: Masks work. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and…
@edgonmir @wandererOTU8 @GlaringSkeptic @JuliansRum Your ideas are absolutely lethal, completely dumb, and totally insane. Masks work. Full stop. https://t.co/7aaCqnKBbi https://t.co/HSjOn6ECZm https://t.co/220id4dAWa https://t.co/VUAFU4d70U https://t.co/
@barneyfranken @HFREEMA83843708 @osullivanauthor And, I don't know how trustworthy 'The Lancet' is but their findings are pretty interesting https://t.co/A4SSwJOxNf
RT @juniordrblog: 16:37 Ah. Masks. Ivor claims there is no evidence they prevent infection, quoting analysis of randomized controlled tria…
Meta-analysis conducted across 16 countries and 6 continents finds physical distancing of at least 1 meter and face mask usage to be significantly associated with lower viral transmission rates: https://t.co/hDodZdHRDb
@o_rips ( 1/2) I have her 4 reports. The prove of #Mindmasks that they work is "low", "weak", "insufficient strong". https://t.co/w291wCwMHd https://t.co/OqBKjtePPj https://t.co/iZIknWLORU ->2
@CheriMa90187572 @charliekirk11 Pesky scientists with their pesky science. "Use of face masks was protective for both health-care workers & people in the community exposed to infection, with both frequentist & Bayesian analyses lending support to f
@JtotheC4 @IrishTimes There's lots. Both individual studies and meta-analyses. Covid-19 isn't the first Coronavirus pandemic. Masks were proven effective years ago. They're how the MERS pandemic was stopped in its tracks. Just Google it. https://t.co/eBi3
@MrC06966767 @marksimonpowell @theJeremyVine https://t.co/qJqFtSglEP Weird that the Lancet cites 172 observational studies and a further 44 healthcare and non-healthcare set studies though? Maybe there are... more than 2 studies on this? Surely the Lanc
This is a really nice systematic review and meta-analysis of data on physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of the viruses responsible for SARS, MERS and #COVID19. https://t.co/cjojDeAjvq
@duncancragg @littledavee @CapitalLivNews Here it is Duncan, although looking at your profile I suspect you won’t believe it regardless. https://t.co/53yXiTkPmZ
@thehill “...data also suggest wearing face masks protects people (both health-care workers & the general public) against infection by these coronaviruses, & eye protection could confer additional benefit.” Only Trump & folks he’s polarized sti
@foogatwo @GovMurphy https://t.co/dSZIWz0ITp Materials are also important