The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Ethical Criteria for the Admission and Management of Patients in the ICU Under Conditions of Limited Medical Resources: A Shared International Proposal in View of the COVID-19 Pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00284 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vittoradolfo Tambone, Donald Boudreau, Massimo Ciccozzi, Karen Sanders, Laura Leondina Campanozzi, Jane Wathuta, Luciano Violante, Roberto Cauda, Carlo Petrini, Antonio Abbate, Rossana Alloni, Josepmaria Argemi, Josep Argemí Renom, Anna De Benedictis, France Galerneau, Emilio García-Sánchez, Giampaolo Ghilardi, Janet Palmer Hafler, Magdalena Linden, Alfredo Marcos, Andrea Onetti Muda, Marco Pandolfi, Thierry Pelaccia, Mario Picozzi, Ruben Oscar Revello, Giovanna Ricci, Robert Rohrbaugh, Patrizio Rossi, Ascanio Sirignano, Antonio Gioacchino Spagnolo, Trevor Stammers, Lourdes Velázquez, Evandro Agazzi, Mark Mercurio |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Librarian | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 31 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,500,228
of 25,551,063 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#752
of 14,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,256
of 422,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#32
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,551,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.