↓ Skip to main content

Intracellular delivery of messenger RNA by recombinant PP7 virus-like particles carrying low molecular weight protamine

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biotechnology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intracellular delivery of messenger RNA by recombinant PP7 virus-like particles carrying low molecular weight protamine
Published in
BMC Biotechnology, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12896-016-0274-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yanli Sun, Yanhua Sun, Ronglan Zhao, Kunshan Gao

Abstract

Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) have been widely used as carriers to transport different molecules into living cells, whereas messenger RNAs (mRNAs) have been utilized as target molecules for the prevention and treatment of various diseases. However, the instability of CPPs and mRNAs has limited their application. Bacteriophage PP7 virus-like particles (VLPs) may protect peptides and RNAs from degradation through displaying foreign peptides on their surface and encapsidating RNA linked with the pac site. In this study, the cDNA of the PP7 coat protein single-chain dimer carrying low molecular weight protamine (LMWP) and the cDNA of green fluorescent protein (GFP) were inserted into two multiple cloning sites of pETDuet-1, respectively. PP7 VLPs carrying the LMWP peptide and GFP mRNA were subsequently expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) with high yield and thermal stability, and were easily purified. The VLPs were also non-replicative, non-infectious, and non-toxic. Moreover, they penetrated the mouse prostate cancer cells RM-1 after 24 h incubation. Last, PP7 VLPs carrying the LMWP could encapsidate the GFP mRNA, which was translated into mature protein in mammalian cells. Recombinant PP7 VLPs can be used simultaneously as a targeted delivery vector for both peptides and mRNA due to their abilities to package RNA and display peptides.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Master 6 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2017.
All research outputs
#17,806,995
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#730
of 935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,376
of 338,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.