↓ Skip to main content

Elevated CO2 Did Not Stimulate Stem Growth in 11 Provenances of a Globally Important Hardwood Plantation Species

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Elevated CO2 Did Not Stimulate Stem Growth in 11 Provenances of a Globally Important Hardwood Plantation Species
Published in
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, June 2020
DOI 10.3389/ffgc.2020.00066
Authors

Anita Wesolowski, Chris J. Blackman, Renee A. Smith, David T. Tissue, Sebastian Pfautsch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 36%
Environmental Science 2 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2020.
All research outputs
#16,464,459
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,123
of 435,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them