↓ Skip to main content

Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006590.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robin WM Vernooij, Michelle Lancee, Anne Cleves, Philipp Dahm, Chris H Bangma, Katja KH Aben

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 12%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Other 6 9%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 12%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 19 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2020.
All research outputs
#853,137
of 16,587,222 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,319
of 11,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,162
of 291,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,587,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.