RT @NatureJapan: Nature ハイライト:COVID-19に対する社会政策の影響を定量化する | Nature https://t.co/BCbYUBqN5L #感染症 #COVID-19
Nature ハイライト:COVID-19に対する社会政策の影響を定量化する | Nature https://t.co/BCbYUBqN5L #感染症 #COVID-19
The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic https://t.co/eNXkfu4hIA
China, South Korea, Italy, Iran, France and the United States; COVID-19 495m infections and 3 million (0.6/1000) deaths averted by anti-contagion policies. Study in Nature. https://t.co/KUmJTabmpq https://t.co/az0hVX56KW
@BombaTruth @billgatesvirus @julesdoyle @iruwteiotbbidih @chicagotribune This will be my only reply to this thread (I don't have much time) I hate misinformation ("lockdowns don't work") so I refute it when I see it. Misinformation is the root of most pro
@hughosmond @PolitiShox @karenyo79605422 You are very wrong, my friend: https://t.co/zagG81CM9G
@jachille2 That is not true. Studies have shown lockdowns averted or delayed cases and deaths: 1- https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ 2- https://t.co/CfCBzEFEj0 3- https://t.co/WBiXl1QCgt Eg. #1 shows 530 million(!) cases were avoided
@cjmichiels @npratc @NPR Oh look a non peer reviewed study ! Try again Ivan. https://t.co/SeoonloBru this is peer reviewed dumb ass.
@kylamb8 @AbsurdAirplane @zorinaqapi @CJ_cyclist Kyle lies again. I never claimed all of them were published studies. Only some are published. Others are either preprints, or my work (which is very far from being of the same quality as a preprint) See
@Fabriziofer1994 @vitalbaa @SignorErnesto Ora che hai avuto molte risposte a livello scientifico, vorrei sapere quali sono le tue illuminanti considerazioni e alternative proposte 😉 https://t.co/d1LtdEgN8I
@Fabriziofer1994 @vitalbaa @SignorErnesto Guarda come sono gentile, te li linko io https://t.co/d1LtdEgN8I
@Fabriziofer1994 @vitalbaa @SignorErnesto Eccoci, due paper rigorosi che parlano degli effetti ex-post delle misure di contenimento non farmaceutiche, tra le quali lockdown stringente. https://t.co/RX2GHeFQZE
@kylamb8 @kool_orange @LibertyOne8 @conserv8320 @Buckeye20031 @EthicalSkeptic Kyle lies again I showed lockdowns worked by giving you 3 studies. None of these studies use the 2-million-death model: https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ https://t.co/CfCBzEFEj0 https://
@AbsurdAirplane @kylamb8 Paper #1 is using data. Read it. Furthermore, I disagree that it relies on circular assumption: https://t.co/5OMST6l2gY
@wamba138 @Buckeye20031 @kylamb8 Many peer-reviewed studies published in renowned journals demonstrate lockdowns have reduced or delayed cases. Lockdowns bought us time to develop test+trace+isolate, social distancing, etc 1- https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ 2-
@GolferReader Posting 2 charts doesn't prove a point. Studies (peer-reviewed, published, all that) have shown lockdowns do reduce cases: 1- https://t.co/iFU7NW821W 2- https://t.co/dOgHIAnoUs 3- https://t.co/WBiXl1QCgt
@Antifearmnger @Buckeye20031 @kylamb8 I love data, I always post data that proves my point (that lockdowns do reduce cases), and that Kyle keeps ignoring: https://t.co/LDAXwiM9vC
@AbsurdAirplane @zorinaqapi @kylamb8 @CJ_cyclist Let me give you a reply that you were waiting for. You argued https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ was using circular reasoning because their assumption was that "lockdowns reduce cases" It is self-evident to the autho
@EyeDoc11 @TimTravis2 @CJ_cyclist @TrackingCovid @kylamb8 How many times do I have to post these studies? Yes lockdowns work: 1- https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ 2- https://t.co/CfCBzEFEj0 3- https://t.co/WBiXl1QCgt
@HaraldofW @gronvita @veteprotein You know, I hate lockdowns just as much as the next guy. But I also recognize, based on data, that they were largely successful in reducing cases and deaths, eg. see: https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ https://t.co/CfCBzEFEj0 htt
@mwkaram85 @kylamb8 Mitigation measures do reduce cases. "We estimate that [...] interventions prevented or delayed on the order of 62 million confirmed cases, corresponding to averting roughly 530 million total infections" https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ Or are
@taboo_red @kylamb8 Lockdowns have averted 500 million infections (https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ) thus they saved 2.5 million lives, assuming a conservative 0.5% Infection Fatality Ratio (the CDC estimates a bit higher: 0.65%)
@corey_vollinger @jbpflipsen Peer-reviewed papers by experts, published in renowned journals like Nature & Science provide ample evidence lockdowns were widely successful. 1- https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ 2- https://t.co/CfCBzEFEj0 3- https://t.co/WBiXl1QCg
@HeinWilfried @SHomburg @c_drosten Bitte sehr. Effektifität der Maßnahmen: https://t.co/ApoC8NgfgS https://t.co/h2NtCQB0C1 Effizienz der Maßnahmen: https://t.co/IU2PQByQip
cc @FatEmperor since you asked for evidence several times 😉 wonder if you've seen any of these
@d_espinet @kylamb8 Don't listen to me, judge the evidence yourself (and take note how Kyle rarely posts evidence): https://t.co/LDAXwiM9vC
@DewireNT @kylamb8 Don't trust me. Judge the evidence yourself: https://t.co/LDAXwiM9vC
@pn_schwartz I read the analyses. They support me: https://t.co/LDAXwiM9vC
@pn_schwartz @AbsurdAirplane @kylamb8 "not a shred of evidence" Err: https://t.co/LDAXwiM9vC
RT @zorinaq: Lockdowns do work: 1-https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ 2-https://t.co/WBiXl1QCgt 3-https://t.co/MZzvD97xGm 4-https://t.co/19tah3XkDL 5-…
RT @zorinaq: @kylamb8 Who to trust: some guy named Kyle on Twitter, or large swaths of published literature? https://t.co/LDAXwiM9vC
@kylamb8 Who to trust: some guy named Kyle on Twitter, or large swaths of published literature? https://t.co/LDAXwiM9vC
@HilgerKerstin @reitschuster Haben Sie sich denn fundiert mit den wissenschaftlichen Veroeffentlichungen befasst? Beispiele: https://t.co/czCeIiIEly, https://t.co/ukbwNkiKmr und https://t.co/c4yvMCfsi6 sind sehr interessante Artikel.
@SeanRipmsm @b30_julie @PX_Entei @nageco @NevilleD35 5mil cases in the US (https://t.co/kBmdjKBoJp), which would have put MORE stress on the economy, with people out of work and less overall productivity. tl;dr: Sweden's strategy is preferable, but populat
@justin_hart Take the first one, peer-reviewed & published in no less than Nature: "interventions prevented or delayed on the order of 62 million confirmed cases, corresponding to averting roughly 530 million total infections." https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ
@justin_hart "little evidence" The vast majority of studies on shutdowns have shown they do work! https://t.co/9IkUbogGL8
@SharonM57345162 @DrEricDing Regions that didn't lock down still implemented other measures (social distancing, school closures, voluntarily working from home...) & this was somewhat effective, just not as effective as a full lockdown Many studies hav
RT @LukeKaven: A study from the Global Policy Lab at Berkeley used in support of "school closures have no impact" claims seems odd, and per…
Esse paper da Nature apontou estimativas mais precisas: https://t.co/9Ligu81Agb
@b30_julie @PX_Entei @nageco @SeanRipmsm @NevilleD35 Idk where you got that opinion from, but I would love to see a source, esp since research says lockdowns dramatically helped curb the spread. https://t.co/kBmdjKBoJp https://t.co/ieDbxAAPTI
@imyourmoderator @jcfrandsen @JillB617 @JakeSherman @replouiegohmert 2. This is frm https://t.co/LT1TWXJ3Tk (highly reputable scientific journal) - see screenshots, and then if u want u can click links to read the peer reviewed research papers that article
@SeBaK_ @CCuadradoN @izkia También se hace el larry con los otros 4 estudios (mencionados en este paper) en que se estimaría que el cierre de los colegios habría tenido un muy bajo impacto: https://t.co/00Q9CWs8OK https://t.co/tVsZoYbELL https://t.co/cK
ARE Ph.D. students' research was published in Nature: "The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic" https://t.co/cWnNDQfOAl
@JamesBo84033013 @slap_jackson "Zero evidence" You better get to work and start reading even a small sample of the evidence: https://t.co/LDAXwiM9vC
RT @hotSahs: @josh37180194 @pacomedic @ROWParamedics @Kathryn_McGarry "...we estimate that early infections of COVID-19 exhibit exponential…
@VaughnBeethoven @Zigmanfreud Except I have.. just not with you tagged in it.. https://t.co/BuCrvu9OOt
@EricDavies18 @Zigmanfreud Tell that to the researchers. You not liking the outcome doesn’t invalidate it as a study. If you can come with up any actual critically thought out criticism of the study, then let’s hear it. But until then, your witty little tu
RT @FifarmaLatam: 500 millones de vidas salvadas del #COVID19 gracias a las medidas preventivas aplicadas en la sociedad. Descubra más aquí…
RT @drcadesky: Without a vaccine or herd immunity we are left with measures like physical distancing, masks, and closures. And these have…
Without a vaccine or herd immunity we are left with measures like physical distancing, masks, and closures. And these have saved over 500 millions lives according to one model https://t.co/6YSVlz2XMf @adriandix @CMA_Docs
@galeodea @AL_Barda @riwely @SergioEfe negar el efecto positivo del confinamiento en la reducción del contagio comunitario y por tanto en la intensidad de la epidemia es como decir que la tierra es plana. Dos papers sobre el tema: - Nature https://t.co/mGP
Study 2: https://t.co/YwJIVS2N2f
@josh37180194 @pacomedic @ROWParamedics @Kathryn_McGarry "...we estimate that early infections of COVID-19 exhibit exponential growth rates of roughly 38% per day. We find that anti-contagion policies have significantly and substantially slowed this growth
RT @astropierre: Selon ces 2 dernières études, les mesures de confinement ont réduit la transmission du virus de 81% en moyenne, évitant 3…
RT @astropierre: Selon ces 2 dernières études, les mesures de confinement ont réduit la transmission du virus de 81% en moyenne, évitant 3…
@tajarvarghese Do you hear how ridiculous that sounds? Denmark/Finland/Norway managed to avoid deaths just because of luck, but at one point they will catch up with Sweden? It's nonsense. Clearly lockdown policies worked, as has been demonstrated by many
@dansinker I don't think that is accurate https://t.co/ICiBZoAqTX https://t.co/UMmVzJivkO https://t.co/2OvEiBFKTw
RT @astropierre: Selon ces 2 dernières études, les mesures de confinement ont réduit la transmission du virus de 81% en moyenne, évitant 3…
RT @astropierre: Selon ces 2 dernières études, les mesures de confinement ont réduit la transmission du virus de 81% en moyenne, évitant 3…
RT @astropierre: Selon ces 2 dernières études, les mesures de confinement ont réduit la transmission du virus de 81% en moyenne, évitant 3…
RT @astropierre: Selon ces 2 dernières études, les mesures de confinement ont réduit la transmission du virus de 81% en moyenne, évitant 3…
RT @astropierre: Selon ces 2 dernières études, les mesures de confinement ont réduit la transmission du virus de 81% en moyenne, évitant 3…
@JonStanich @mr_forsberg @gnrlgrevious @OttoKolbl @BallouxFrancois Face it: you will probably never find waterproof evidence of causation or non-causation. But you will find strong correlation, and, in this particular case, it suggests causation (because
@OttoKolbl @EdwardBullard8 @Soniaba78719443 @BallouxFrancois More evidence lockdowns work: https://t.co/LDAXwiM9vC
ما الذي تحقق من الإقفال العام، التباعد الاجتماعي، الإلتزام بإرتداء الكمامات وغيرها من التدابير الأخرى المضادة لجائحة كورونا؟ أحد الدراسات قدرت أن هذه الإجراءات منعت/أخرت مايزيد عن ٥٠٠ مليون حالة كورونا جديدة واكثر من مليوني حالة وفاة المصدر👇🏻👇🏻 https
The curves of #COVID19 cases, & related hospitalizations & deaths, in various countries show a steep upward slope ... followed by a plateau ... then a fall (except in the U.S. where #COVIDiotInChief = numbers still rising!). https://t.co/lESfag3K
RT @PolicySociety: Nature article cites P&S Covid-19 special issue intro by @gilibertocapano @howlettm @darryljarvis5 @goyal_nihit and M Ra…
@jselanikio Yes this was shown by many studies, specifically a timing correlation between start of the lockdown and impact on cases and deaths: https://t.co/9IkUbogGL8
@Crestone14 "covid killed itself" is not at all the scientific consensus. It was brought under control thanks to lockdowns. Evidence: https://t.co/LDAXwiM9vC
@jselanikio And I'm not the only one who has shown that lockdowns are the reasons deaths and cases have declined when implemented: https://t.co/LDAXwiM9vC To suggest COVID-19 went away on its own in NY is not the consensus among public health experts
@ColohDisturbia @ElianeReal3 @soueuMaeli @fabiobope @ramedvasconcel1 @CNNBrasil Você é idiota ou mau-caráter? https://t.co/5XQgbLBSWx https://t.co/khMI6dzVaO
@hughosmond @CovidSenseBloke @hector_drummond @FatEmperor @MianneBagger @SpeddingCharlie @ClarkeMicah @LPerrins There's evidence it bought us some time in many locations https://t.co/thmRp9Zxv4 Ideally you test, trace and isolate and no lockdown required (
RT @PolicySociety: Nature article cites P&S Covid-19 special issue intro by @gilibertocapano @howlettm @darryljarvis5 @goyal_nihit and M Ra…
RT @PolicySociety: Nature article cites P&S Covid-19 special issue intro by @gilibertocapano @howlettm @darryljarvis5 @goyal_nihit and M Ra…
Nature article cites P&S Covid-19 special issue intro by @gilibertocapano @howlettm @darryljarvis5 @goyal_nihit and M Ramesh @nature #COVID19 https://t.co/SyT2py5hox
@FatEmperor When you publish a paper, I'll read it: https://t.co/thmRp9Zxv4
RT @Dr_Mike_Stevens: Estimating the effect of #COVID-19 mitigation strategies in 6 countries: over 500 million infections prevented https:/…
The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic | Nature https://t.co/6uhUoFVhtc
Estimating the effect of #COVID-19 mitigation strategies in 6 countries: over 500 million infections prevented https://t.co/Iiht3XtSYj
@rinjinNo13 私はロックダウンと集団免疫のどちらが今回のCOVID-19に対するに正解なのか結論を出せずにいます。 ロックダウンの効果についてはnature に記載があります。 中,韓,伊,米,仏,イランにおける対策(ロックダウン+α)の効果で5億3000万人の感染回避が成ったと試算しています。 https://t.co/4YVhJf4mAm
上記リンク中、6/8の項では「ロックダウンはパンデミックへの強力な対抗手段である」という論文を紹介 https://t.co/P4eXDooUHv #GoToキャンペーンを中止してください #GoToキャンペーン予算を補償に回せ
@pohutukawa @SueBoyde @kieranross856 @nzherald https://t.co/CMCtT4wtbm Hold on, back up the truck there and get off your moronic pedastal. read this article first.
“.. Anti-contagion policies prevented or delayed on the order of 62 million confirmed cases, corresponding to averting roughly 530 million total infections.” https://t.co/lpjNSWQm7N
RT @BioDecoded: The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic | Nature https://t.co/Hs1a4IWioE #COVID19
The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 #coronavirus pandemic https://t.co/w7FcqOdkTl via @ian_bolliger et al
RT @MBittencourtMD: Se te falaram que "isolamento" não funciona, como se distanciamento físico fosse tudo igual, uma coisa só e fosse a úni…
RT @snoosphere: @charliekirk11 The counter to his disinformation is science: --> lockdowns reduced transmission by 81% https://t.co/2SPVUi…
@charliekirk11 Here's a paper on it that I doubt you'll read https://t.co/nt2M9krEpI