The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic

@Devuz02 @SolHidramix @jcoelho2000 @caiocgomes https://t.co/xeq6Czy0fC

@marshray https://t.co/1bhjPRrmkD

RT @les_vaxxeuses: @KoTsukicat @Pierre_GTIL Donc dans tous les pays qui ont confiné, les contaminations ont chuté pile deux semaines après…

@KoTsukicat @Pierre_GTIL Donc dans tous les pays qui ont confiné, les contaminations ont chuté pile deux semaines après le début des confinements par hasard ? On a vu des gens nier l'évidence, mais la c'est de la bêtise pure 🤡 Allez, un peu de lecture pour

@RoboJew88 @J_N_Ryder @TravAlvord @goddeketal Here’s a reading list for you!

@valented87 @Luciandrade https://t.co/FUX5Yy7D7b

RT @YvonneBecherini: Still waiting for the @nature paper by Anders Tegnell on his "creative" strategy with no scientific background and no…

@ZuEndeDenken @kwippo @FrankfurtZack Die Wirksamkeit von Lockdown-Maßnahmen ist wissenschaftlich belegt (Hier nur ein paar wenige Studienlinks). https://t.co/MwUteywjXn... https://t.co/U1VisBudCg https://t.co/TjdgZZlt2f https://t.co/XA0fGl5UEh https://t.c

@LibertyLockPod -Masks work: https://t.co/rVxVfYD0bi -Lockdowns work: https://t.co/lSuaASOtzQ -The vax is both safe and effective: https://t.co/PAAvzlyaiu -There is no evidence anything came from a lab: https://t.co/GmRgx8CEEo

RT @AlanVRK: This is a thread about @WSJ's terrible Covid cherry-picking - in an area much closer to my expertise - in June 2020. https://…

This is a thread about @WSJ's terrible Covid cherry-picking - in an area much closer to my expertise - in June 2020. https://t.co/zXSJtgpKbM

@WildPersistence @brosseau_lisa Remember that I said that the growth rate can be equated to the overall baseline risk. But even better these papers estimate the effect on the growth rate per NPI: Solomon Hsiang, The effect of large-scale anti-contagion pol

@CryptoSala @TheRealKeean That's just like, your opinion dude. https://t.co/4kJJPqBZ6W https://t.co/GSdpwovmQJ

@DanielHadas2 @james_e_b_ Papers in Science/Nature alone: https://t.co/im9Z100U5o

@WinfriedKrause1 @reitschuster Achja? Die ersten Studien erschienen bereits 2020 in "Nature", u.a. https://t.co/10BZm73yK3 https://t.co/F4NK7xFCk6 Wollen Sie noch mehr? Oder lieber weiterhin Ihren stumpfen polemischen Blödsinn tweeten? Bildung und eine

RT @bigodeguerra: @AdrianoFroner @geaneliby @reporterenato Estudos q comprovam q o lockdown funciona: https://t.co/WSUaAGu4ov https://t.co/…

@AdrianoFroner @geaneliby @reporterenato Estudos q comprovam q o lockdown funciona: https://t.co/WSUaAGu4ov https://t.co/Bt0FmTk1BC https://t.co/YtJ0h3nScU https://t.co/QpU5kU9Zgm Trás um único estudo q comprove q lockdown n funciona. Um único!! Sobre a su

@KarmaOne10 @GuillaumeBarucq Bonne lecture. https://t.co/GTzuRnyHdQ

@y_yrittaja @Dimmu141 ...itse... https://t.co/gMsxkwfv16

RT @beenwrekt: @ajlamesa It's wild that we forget that most PH people thought masking was completely useless. Check out this early nature p…

@ajlamesa It's wild that we forget that most PH people thought masking was completely useless. Check out this early nature paper trying to estimate interventions. No masking policies are even considered! https://t.co/im9Z0ZIKRg

@chytrablond @PetrH31057946 Je potřeba to dokládat. Jenže vy nemáte jediný argument a místo toho šíříte dezinformace společně s Vrábelem, Netíkem a dalšími proruskými šváby 🤮 https://t.co/r8UDxbF92F

@skunkhunt93 @IcepointMilik https://t.co/QLCNLvufWo

@WineDelicious @Lenka_SCI_MUNI @CRoPlus Závěry studií jsou zcela jasné, lockdowny fungují. https://t.co/QLCNLvufWo

@MEUNIERPatric11 @las_isab @LMucchielli @CNRS Vous avez sans doute lu toutes ces études que vos documents ne citent à aucun moment ? https://t.co/GTzuRnzf3o

@MarkSwanNews @dostalondrej @R_Bartonicek A pokud chcete více zdrojů: 1. https://t.co/MZDVQdQ6G7 2. https://t.co/LcC2VU6XVM 3. https://t.co/wS8O5nySwH 4. https://t.co/IDdnDV47Jb 5. https://t.co/pR8MiPVOgM 6. https://t.co/fltvtuO9Qc 7. https://t.co/qpBvwP2P

@ReinfoCovidOff Encore un expert pas foutu de lire les études sur le sujet. https://t.co/GTzuRnyHdQ

@chickendragonX @ElvirSmajlovic1 @mixtorious1 @POTUS alright. what about these studies. i wont spend my time countering the points of each tweet, and I'll suggest you to submit your points to a journal ;) 1)https://t.co/XdIZXX1yCT 2)https://t.co/NgAsiSG5

@ElvirSmajlovic1 @chickendragonX @mixtorious1 @POTUS https://t.co/NgAsiSG5nT

@MSMisAScam @shakethemonkey @JoeBlowski4 @Jeawel71 @annbauerwriter lol, explain why the ones I linked are incorrect first - https://t.co/60Ag1LN2Dc https://t.co/eRoApPs7oe

@MSMisAScam @shakethemonkey @JoeBlowski4 @Jeawel71 @annbauerwriter https://t.co/60Ag1LN2Dc https://t.co/eRoApPs7oe There's quite a few that quantify how many lives are saved.

@shreemism @TheMarkFreeman @Vanillasky8788 @PFansiar @lavern_spicer @CharlieCrist There's no way to get a hard number. However, there are several methods for estimating it. Here's one for you to examine yourself. https://t.co/p6nCMC4P9n

dois artigos publicados na revista Nature já apresentavam estimativas dos efeitos iniciais das medidas restritivas. Um deles (Hsiang et al), tratando das medidas de redução de contágio adotadas em 1,7 mil diferentes localidades da Ásia, Europa e EUA, até e

@guesada1977 @jairbolsonaro Vamo se informa um pouquinho bolsominions https://t.co/n9JPO6HyXb https://t.co/t26Lh210Ym

@EduardoASantini @gilbertolrocha @mandetta @jornalnacional Outra: https://t.co/oVYcEf57TC

@PortxCarlota @TiaLuDF @ZimermanRicardo @oatila @iserrapilheira Como eu disse, Lockdown é uma PLAUSIBILIDADE EXTREMA. Funciona (eficácia) O que se questiona é sua EFETIVIDADE, que depende de alguns fatores, e pode ser mais eficiente em alguns países e outr

@RomanLasota @berniderschreck @DickSchweinchen ☆ https://t.co/Xiw4wskaa3

@grantbuttenshaw @Spartengerm @Adam_Creighton @KobieThatcher I don't have that kinda time, fortunately someone else has done the work for me: https://t.co/JD2EcLcjGX https://t.co/QAOti1pBcX.

@LeagueTruth @Mingle1232 @SimonsonMolly @No3spera @wokbonds @KashPrime @JesseTMcCann @DrEricDing @denise_dewald @benryanwriter Aha, That was in reference to this terrible paper. https://t.co/yRFP4YpHCU

RT @je_vous_aime33: @Ulysse_Rives @Esban_ Cet exemple est un mythe, c'est certes difficile d'isoler l'impact mais de nombreuses études dont…

@Ulysse_Rives @Esban_ Cet exemple est un mythe, c'est certes difficile d'isoler l'impact mais de nombreuses études dont une dans Nature (un des meilleurs journaux) montrent l'utilité de la mesure: https://t.co/zKCTN5g4wv (En plus digeste tu as cet article

何故か、コロナの感染症モデルのまとめをしているので、ついでに公衆衛生対策の効果の論文を読んでる。 https://t.co/JmcwfBdALH https://t.co/JAfsfjIEGl とかが、引用数多そう(2020年だけど)

@holmenkollin @alfonsgunsemann @musikutiv @BR24 Und die anderen Studien, die alle in die gleiche Richtung gehen sind auch Quatsch? Hast du denn irgndwas, um deine Behauptungen zu untermauern? https://t.co/Dd7JjN6zUE

@apsmunro @TAH_Sci All good. However, misusing modelling as propaganda is not a *new* trend; this is a bizarre oversight. This is from June 2020: “Lockdown and school closures in Europe may have prevented 3.1m deaths” https://t.co/C3qHpeuPEF https://t

@tommytwotoes13 @therealmissjo @Reuters Receipt 2: https://t.co/4HNMrx2isC

RT @Hosenmaus1: 14/* Falls ihr mal wieder auf Schwurbler trefft.. Hier sind noch ein paar mehr Studien zur Effektivität von Maßnahmen. 1…

@Citizen0420 @richard_ruzicka @jirikovoego Lockdowny fungují: 1. https://t.co/MZDVQdPyQz 2. https://t.co/LcC2VU6q6e 3. https://t.co/wS8O5nykH9 4. https://t.co/IDdnDV3zTD 5. https://t.co/pR8MiPVgre 6. https://t.co/fltvtuNC0E 7. https://t.co/qpBvwP2hTP 8. h

RT @Hosenmaus1: 14/* Falls ihr mal wieder auf Schwurbler trefft.. Hier sind noch ein paar mehr Studien zur Effektivität von Maßnahmen. 1…

@Citizen0420 @richard_ruzicka @jirikovoego Lockdowny fungují: 1. https://t.co/MZDVQdPyQz 2. https://t.co/LcC2VU6q6e 3. https://t.co/wS8O5nykH9 4. https://t.co/IDdnDV3zTD 5. https://t.co/pR8MiPVgre 6. https://t.co/fltvtuNC0E 7. https://t.co/qpBvwP2hTP 8. h

RT @Hosenmaus1: 14/* Falls ihr mal wieder auf Schwurbler trefft.. Hier sind noch ein paar mehr Studien zur Effektivität von Maßnahmen. 1…

RT @Hosenmaus1: 14/* Falls ihr mal wieder auf Schwurbler trefft.. Hier sind noch ein paar mehr Studien zur Effektivität von Maßnahmen. 1…

@rcepcany Lockdowny fungují: 1. https://t.co/MZDVQdPyQz 2. https://t.co/LcC2VU6q6e 3. https://t.co/wS8O5nykH9 4. https://t.co/IDdnDV3zTD 5. https://t.co/pR8MiPVgre 6. https://t.co/fltvtuNC0E 7. https://t.co/qpBvwP2hTP 8. https://t.co/bOgko23Lim 9. https:/

RT @Hosenmaus1: 14/* Falls ihr mal wieder auf Schwurbler trefft.. Hier sind noch ein paar mehr Studien zur Effektivität von Maßnahmen. 1…

RT @Hosenmaus1: 14/* Falls ihr mal wieder auf Schwurbler trefft.. Hier sind noch ein paar mehr Studien zur Effektivität von Maßnahmen. 1…

@ZubyMusic https://t.co/z3KoOD7hi1 You can dispute Nature, one of the most, if not the most, scientifically rigorous and respected journals. 495 million infections prevented which extrapolares to millions of lives saved.

@NattQui @emarres @Jey26898344 @DocteurDodo @Rossojf @Chamchamat En parlant de sources.... https://t.co/GTzuRnyHdQ

@NattQui @DocteurDodo @emarres @Jey26898344 @Rossojf @Chamchamat Bonne lecture... https://t.co/GTzuRnyHdQ

@euterpe_samuse @camcalou @DreamOn01551786 @ar_wax7 @hellowo19575078 https://t.co/GTzuRnyHdQ

@MarkMarksen3 @SHomburg Blödsinn. Es gibt genug Studien mit einem anderen Ergebnis: https://t.co/gXQPPnlvJ2

@slunsky @Jco72493437 @mira_notfunny @WhyCrow Lockdowny fungují: 1. https://t.co/MZDVQdPyQz 2. https://t.co/LcC2VU6q6e 3. https://t.co/wS8O5nykH9 4. https://t.co/IDdnDV3zTD 5. https://t.co/pR8MiPVgre 6. https://t.co/fltvtuNC0E 7. https://t.co/qpBvwP2hTP 8

@GabinJean3 @arikouts @Scintigraphiste On m'avait sorti ça mais c'est pas fameux (modèles et compagnies). https://t.co/Pf5NObdvut

@holmenkollin https://t.co/SgnsYN9Vsv

@jsv0x @marciocr @ivanildoiii Lockdowns funcionam, recomendo ler uns estudos científicos de verdade e sair dessa bolha onde ser negacionista é ter "bom senso" 👍🏻 https://t.co/ZoaMGTawnX

@fjqy76gv4h @marciocr @ahuuulll @AstroSpaceXXX @ivanildoiii Esse aqui é um exemplo que achei em uma pesquisa rápida do Google. Se quiser, pesquise lá que vai encontrar vários outros 👍🏻 https://t.co/ZoaMGTawnX

@AstorAaron Even at the beginning of the pandemic, it was impossible to find data that school closures were useful NPIs. I have many issues with the methods in this paper, but it both was influential and found that school closures were ineffective. https:

@lonnibesancon Le point 2/ (https://t.co/EJ3Mki1xRg) => estimation basé une modélisation basique et des assomptions. Pas de _preuve_.

@SahabiaAli Ah tu en veux? Sur le danger: https://t.co/5aDjHKpXOr Sur l'efficacité: https://t.co/qU9iiwscHg https://t.co/6eKU0SgE6s https://t.co/VdjKeKDlHM

RT @Hosenmaus1: 14/* Falls ihr mal wieder auf Schwurbler trefft.. Hier sind noch ein paar mehr Studien zur Effektivität von Maßnahmen. 1…

RT @Hosenmaus1: 14/* Falls ihr mal wieder auf Schwurbler trefft.. Hier sind noch ein paar mehr Studien zur Effektivität von Maßnahmen. 1…

RT @Hosenmaus1: 14/* Falls ihr mal wieder auf Schwurbler trefft.. Hier sind noch ein paar mehr Studien zur Effektivität von Maßnahmen. 1…

RT @Hosenmaus1: 14/* Falls ihr mal wieder auf Schwurbler trefft.. Hier sind noch ein paar mehr Studien zur Effektivität von Maßnahmen. 1…

@angelo_roncaly @NancyOliver86 @tarantelli__ @AndreSuzi @Rconstantino Claro, são duas coisas distintas, mas tudo bem. Aí vai: https://t.co/KurYmFZGwv https://t.co/b4Vj3NKWbA https://t.co/jYpaG5fxMX https://t.co/12iaJ7LaFt https://t.co/frOw2MwevV

@Carl__Poulton @DrJBhattacharya https://t.co/v2sAXH1UaD No problem, i'll just leave this peer-reviewed paper up here and if you want to look at it, go for it. If you don't, then don't. You're very passionate and repetitive, so i can understand the latter

@fieldofgreeninc @DrJBhattacharya https://t.co/v2sAXH1UaD Peer reviewed study on the efficacy of #Lockdown what it was trying to accomplish and what it did accomplish.

@damain_xi @0596Simon @OdysseusPx888 @DrJBhattacharya https://t.co/v2sAXH1UaD Ok so don't speak on China, here is a peer reviewed paper on the efficacy and reasoning behind lockdown measures. I bet my bottom dollar this wont change your mind. That's the p

@DianaVilliers1 @dinahgirl88 @DrJBhattacharya https://t.co/v2sAXH1UaD

@AntiPUDE @MarcoCantamessa Multivariate ... mi raccomando. Il contesto e' importante e le analisi semoplificate all'assurdo le si faccia altrove. Quanto al cherry-picking, ce n'e' a iosa. https://t.co/PLCU24q8jH

@leftychris3 @The_Ouroboros__ @Saffiya_Khan1 @ataritweets @IndependentSage This was settled >2 yrs ago bud for all diseases, here's a bunch about covid. That's not even the argument Brownstone make you numbskull https://t.co/EGvmUaGYFm

@Dr_Tad @alyspraxis @adamkotsko @Unemployedneg The necropoliticos are out doing their thing in twitter comments today, I see. https://t.co/REKU3JxbQZ

RT @MarkFabian_UTas: We find a strong negative association between our mood search index across English speaking countries and deaths from…

We find a strong negative association between our mood search index across English speaking countries and deaths from COVID 19. Lockdowns reduce excess deaths (https://t.co/mAndqHMkia, https://t.co/Y1cvgYLJgv), thereby improving mood. https://t.co/xM3mN

@ReaganoRonaldo @craigmindrum @Davidlaz 10. https://t.co/EqSH7l035Z

@BridennePierre @MartinKulldorff A "fact" unsupported by any actual research. Lockdowns were associated with fewer deaths in multiple jurisdictions. To name just one study: https://t.co/McnBOjr5vB

@enniomagnarelli @GovernorTomWolf Studies show a whole spectrum of outcomes depending on who's doing the studies. The latest 0.2% study is not even a study and it's BS. It wasn't from John Hopkins, not peer reviewed, and improperly weighted different studi

RT @zorinaq: 10. https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ ✅ "interventions prevented or delayed on the order of 61 million confirmed cases, corresponding to…

RT @zorinaq: 10. https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ ✅ "interventions prevented or delayed on the order of 61 million confirmed cases, corresponding to…

RT @zorinaq: 10. https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ ✅ "interventions prevented or delayed on the order of 61 million confirmed cases, corresponding to…

RT @zorinaq: 10. https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ ✅ "interventions prevented or delayed on the order of 61 million confirmed cases, corresponding to…

RT @zorinaq: 10. https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ ✅ "interventions prevented or delayed on the order of 61 million confirmed cases, corresponding to…

RT @zorinaq: 10. https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ ✅ "interventions prevented or delayed on the order of 61 million confirmed cases, corresponding to…

RT @zorinaq: 10. https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ ✅ "interventions prevented or delayed on the order of 61 million confirmed cases, corresponding to…

RT @zorinaq: Lockdowns work. Nearly all studies suggest that is the case: 1-https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ 2-https://t.co/CfCBzEFEj0 3-https://t…

RT @zorinaq: 10. https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ ✅ "interventions prevented or delayed on the order of 61 million confirmed cases, corresponding to…

RT @zorinaq: #6 "lockdowns don't work" Vast majority of peer-reviewed, published science disagrees. NPIs (nonpharmaceutical interventions)…

RT @zorinaq: 10. https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ ✅ "interventions prevented or delayed on the order of 61 million confirmed cases, corresponding to…

RT @zorinaq: 10. https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ ✅ "interventions prevented or delayed on the order of 61 million confirmed cases, corresponding to…

RT @zorinaq: 10. https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ ✅ "interventions prevented or delayed on the order of 61 million confirmed cases, corresponding to…

RT @zorinaq: 10. https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ ✅ "interventions prevented or delayed on the order of 61 million confirmed cases, corresponding to…

RT @zorinaq: 10. https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ ✅ "interventions prevented or delayed on the order of 61 million confirmed cases, corresponding to…

10. https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ ✅ "interventions prevented or delayed on the order of 61 million confirmed cases, corresponding to averting approximately 495 million total infections" (Aug 2020)