@SjaQweer @apenoten @ReneRook1 @Pegerella @MarcVegt @ricodevos @Marcel_Hegeman @AkashJeroen @mvwoensel @Hvbt36Henny @TraderTemmie @gelijkhebjehans @VaxxDoc @BeedeGee @Poempieloempie1 @harryhol Lockdowns work. Nearly all studies suggest that is the case: 1-
@RenBrescansin @x_marquesss @orlandosilva Medidas restritivas não funcionam? Conteste também os artigos a seguir. Não esqueça de publicar. https://t.co/uHgW9ZjYRq https://t.co/yM5FPj9N31 https://t.co/0DHzEVgJaV https://t.co/pGNIQ2gAqq https://t.co/v7M
@pjakma @MarkChangizi Also https://t.co/Z3mQ3RpeST is the source of using delta(log(cumulative)) and they pull assert that it works without any backup.
@JimmeNieuws @ThaCleanerNL @BrakkeSjoerd @JJ_Almekinders Ach ja, oud nieuws, weer zo'n studie van John Ioannidis waarvan je de uitkomst al bij voorbaat kon voorspellen. Lockdowns work. Nearly all studies suggest that is the case: 1-https://t.co/uYPzaapuNs
@MarcVegt @ThaCleanerNL Lockdowns werken. Zie deze studies: 1-https://t.co/uYPzaapuNs 2-https://t.co/7Wcxzm0dLP 3-https://t.co/YZN9n6NarP 4-https://t.co/SxYZPWNDgS 5-https://t.co/Bte2x7lKWF 6-https://t.co/OUd1BzgBfq 7-https://t.co/r0olRF7mk4 8-https://t.co
@Crypto_Hux Und mal allgemein: Nur weil die Studie (vermeintlich!) ins Konzept der Leerdenker passt, ist sie nicht der Goldstandard! Es gibt eine ganze Menge Studien, die es anders sehen: https://t.co/MLz4mU5OAU
@Rac80Rodrigo @eliezerxp @MBittencourtMD @Medicina_CFM Mas como você pediu estudos, vamos a eles: 1) https://t.co/fB1iEkD7eh, análise de 1700 locais onde foram utilizadas medidas de isolamento social, publicado na Nature e revisado;+
@don_awb @lazerfunk @schendelandreas @Danijela_888 @MrJonasDanner @SHomburg Gibt viel mehr, die es nachweisen. Außerdem ist doch logisch, dass ich weniger Leute anstecke, wenn ich weniger treffe! https://t.co/MLz4mU5OAU
@Nordseemigrant @HolgerHamburgo @rosenbusch_ @SHomburg Und es ist ja nicht so, dass es keine anderen Artikel und Studien gibt (das LMU Papier ist nicht einmal eine Studie): https://t.co/MLz4mU5OAU
@teddyhh @EugenGoebel @MeMysel58498263 @c_lindner Nichts leichter als das 😂! https://t.co/MLz4mU5OAU
@elsadog_ @kira_millana There's been plenty of detailed studies. But it follows from basic understanding of respiratory viruses (if people don't breath the same air, they can't catch them), and the results are clear from a casual glance at all-cause mortal
@GurtStock @AndreasPrucha @BergheimJeff Aber bitte, Studien: https://t.co/MLz4mU5OAU
@G_Giglinger @Johanna47228842 @MathematikerRuR @SHomburg @c_drosten Uuuuund... falsch! 👇 https://t.co/h9r5LohvwT
@DanielFmg01 @RBinoto @jairbolsonaro Usar manchete ou estudos científicos? Acho que prefiro estudos. Detalhe: nem sequer o debate é sobre lockdown, mas sim sobre um presidente que quer aglomerações, não uso de máscara e antivax e, também, sobre os acéfalos
Tá querendo comprovação científica, @BolsonaroSP? Tó aqui: https://t.co/37J991JkW8 https://t.co/AMy6Eis7oH https://t.co/5gyfUdl8nI Se você tirar 10 minutos pra ser útil em vida, vai encontrar milhares.
RT @JaiKanta22: @youyanggu You should be embarrassed. https://t.co/E6zumlhHb8
@andrefernm @DouglasGarcia Manda isso também https://t.co/7U3BjvzzFm
@BolsonaroSP Coisa mais fácil é achar artigos que demonstrem a eficácia do Lockdown em epidemias, e atualmente também com o Covid. https://t.co/JTO1L51vST
@mouraedu2 @BlogdoNoblat Aqui está, é um artigo sobre a ação anti-contagio (Lockdown) em 2020, implementado em alguns países, com gráficos. https://t.co/W2qPwDP3rw
RT @JaiKanta22: @AnthonySabatini Florida moron. https://t.co/E6zumlhHb8
@DrBruceScott ...Which is unsurprising, because that's what the peer-reviewed literature says. https://t.co/c6EYHcFJwM
@ScaryTimes2 @EwanMacKenna With a large section of the population already vaccinated with one dose. There are plenty of studies and paper that say lockdowns have been effective. Thread. https://t.co/7AZGzEEpI4
@terranc53977996 @PAHouseGOP Lockdowns saved lives that is why it is a major indicator https://t.co/w37rdLlhe4
RT @lonnibesancon: Meanwhile in Sweden. Perhaps the health minister should read any of these 4 papers? https://t.co/qU9iiwJNyO https://t.c…
RT @lonnibesancon: Meanwhile in Sweden. Perhaps the health minister should read any of these 4 papers? https://t.co/qU9iiwJNyO https://t.c…
Meanwhile in Sweden. Perhaps the health minister should read any of these 4 papers? https://t.co/qU9iiwJNyO https://t.co/QhHUNdl0gI https://t.co/6eKU0RZ2HS https://t.co/C4BT4UBoMV
RT @lonnibesancon: Sinon les études sérieuses: confinement ça marche https://t.co/6eKU0RZ2HS https://t.co/C4BT4UBoMV
RT @lonnibesancon: Sinon les études sérieuses: confinement ça marche https://t.co/6eKU0RZ2HS https://t.co/C4BT4UBoMV
Sinon les études sérieuses: confinement ça marche https://t.co/6eKU0RZ2HS https://t.co/C4BT4UBoMV
@Hache_Berlin @Freundin81 @chluetge Und natürlich wirkt Lockdown! https://t.co/MLz4mU5OAU
RT @lonnibesancon: @DiscipleFeynman @heikki_bear @m4xim1l1an You lost mate. I'm giving you 3 very well done and robust ones! That's without…
@DiscipleFeynman @heikki_bear @m4xim1l1an You lost mate. I'm giving you 3 very well done and robust ones! That's without looking or updating since November last year. Next time learn to google scholar and stop spreading lies. https://t.co/qU9iiwJNyO https
@AvenueLord @Takeastepback16 @JuliaHB1 @Femi_Sorry Liar there's an epic amount of evidence they work as intended https://t.co/5EKuGnSsYP That's not a Liberal process you wassock and the ONS count from death certificates isn't based on that and is HIGHER.
@Hernan64004626 @Subrayado En lugar de repetir boludeces, hace una búsqueda seria en internet. Hay cientos de artículos científicos sobre el asunto. Empezó por acá: https://t.co/SSsMUZ3iJw
@junio2312 @em_com Desculpa mas dizer que não há comprovação científica sobre lockdown é porque não acompanha o tema. Passo apenas um mas nos tempos de hoje, acreditar em ciência é escolha. https://t.co/dDZvHGZE7O
@troyrmichaud @DonaldBestCA @randyhillier @WRPSToday @Chief_BLarkin @oncivlib "Can't find ANY that say they do." it literally took me 30 seconds to find this... "consistent evidence that the policy packages that were deployed to reduce the rate of transmi
@raphaels7 @whizdaddy @MicrobiomDigest @GidMK @DrZoeHyde @dgurdasani1 @DavidSteadson @DrEricDing @nathanpsmad @T_Fiolet "Useless intervention" is again an interesting choice. Papers showing no effect are usually badly done: - https://t.co/HLXDWKDvGG - htt
@voixdhumain @kaehvogel @DavidSteadson Ce billet de blog est faux. CF https://t.co/6eKU0RZ2HS https://t.co/C4BT4UBoMV Pour les papiers qui tentent de montrer que les confinements ne marchent pas. Ils sont pétés. CF https://t.co/HLXDWKDvGG https://t.co/aThn
@raefneerg @BryantSpeech @BenMarten @gummibear737 Huh? No, that's a load of bollocks every study shows the controls work https://t.co/z7j8Lgc0J1 That it's a bit more complicated than "did they use lockdowns and do they have high death rates" doesn't mean
@AlexZwitter2 @ROO3sixty @RAFALOCA1 @FatEmperor @Marco_Piani Buddy. All the evidence shows NPIs work. This isn't even the argument anymore - it's what's worthwhile and whether less can work as well, which is the argument you're making. Apparently you're t
@GrosjeanMcLaren Israel, Coreia do Sul, Japão, Canada, China, Chile discordam de vc 2021 e a gente ja tem tanto estudos falando q lockdown tem efeitos positivos na pandemia isso n deveria nem ser pauta mais https://t.co/ny6q9QSFzS https://t.co/b9TkBBjtV
@onthewall_fly @TakethatCt @Bernp1953P @ScepticalBear @OpinionCovid Huh? It's not a treatment, it's a time-limited preventative. It's no wonder y'all get so confused. You don't know if you're looking at a whisk or a screwdriver https://t.co/z7j8Lgc0J1
@SRGIOHOLANDA3 @thiaguindie @BlogdoNoblat @GadoDecider Lockdown funciona e tem artigos que provam, ciência de verdade https://t.co/7U3BjvzzFm
@cooovin @wllmgareth @talkRADIO @JuliaHB1 @MartinDaubney "No evidence of"? https://t.co/fJXjFjONFy
@Josecbf74 @MiriamNetto @bao_papo @TercioTomaz não se assuste com um Artigo PEER REVIEWED de verdade, ok: https://t.co/xqANfTQSLM
@MiriamNetto @bao_papo @TercioTomaz Como assim? Está falando sério que não sabia que Lockdown funciona(eu sou contra como fizeram, mas sempre foi claro que funciona, basta ver os números)? Mas vou te mandar mesmo assim: https://t.co/xqANfU8uam
@p_finocchiaro @AurelianoStingi Io aggiungerei che ci sono studi peer-reviewed, tra i tanti, che provano l’efficacia del lockdown. #Borghi vada a fare altro, che è meglio. https://t.co/ZmLt6BLxT3 https://t.co/0ESI5wHKjb
@powerpibio @borghi_claudio Ecco due studi peer-reviewed, tra i tanti, che provano l’efficacia del lockdown. #Borghi vada a fare altro, che è meglio. https://t.co/ZmLt6BLxT3 https://t.co/0ESI5wHKjb
@Nostromo_Mijas @borghi_claudio Non è uno studio peer-reviewed. Ecco invece due studi peer-reviewed, tra i tanti, che provano l’efficacia del lockdown. https://t.co/ZmLt6BLxT3 https://t.co/0ESI5wHKjb
@borghi_claudio Non mi pare peer-reviewed lo studio in questione. Ascolto #Borghi, si occupi di mini-bot, che è meglio per tutti. Ecco due studi peer-reviewed, tra i tanti, che provano l’efficacia del lockdown. https://t.co/ZmLt6BLxT3 https://t.co/0ESI5w
@Carlo314159 @franziskanava @borghi_claudio @PiazzapulitaLA7 Ecco due studi peer-reviewed, tra i tanti, che provano l’efficacia del lockdown. #Borghi vada a fare altro, che è meglio. https://t.co/ZmLt6BLxT3 https://t.co/0ESI5wHKjb
@azzurra_fenice @franziskanava @borghi_claudio @PiazzapulitaLA7 Ecco due studi peer-reviewed, tra i tanti, che provano l’efficacia del lockdown. #Borghi vada a fare altro, che è meglio. https://t.co/ZmLt6BLxT3 https://t.co/0ESI5wHKjb
@orsoorsi @franziskanava @borghi_claudio @PiazzapulitaLA7 Ha studiato male. Ecco due studi peer-reviewed, tra i tanti, che provano l’efficacia del lockdown. #Borghi vada a fare altro, che è meglio. https://t.co/ZmLt6BLxT3 https://t.co/0ESI5wHKjb
@Testament73 @VittorioBanti @franziskanava @borghi_claudio @PiazzapulitaLA7 Ecco due studi peer-reviewed, tra i tanti, che provano l’efficacia del lockdown. Borghi vada a fare altro, che è meglio. https://t.co/ZmLt6BLxT3 https://t.co/0ESI5wHKjb
@VittorioBanti @franziskanava @borghi_claudio @PiazzapulitaLA7 Ecco due studi peer-reviewed, tra i tanti, che provano l’efficacia del lockdown. Borghi vada a fare altro, che è meglio. https://t.co/ZmLt6BLxT3 https://t.co/0ESI5wHKjb
@CeppoGrezzo @franziskanava @borghi_claudio @PiazzapulitaLA7 Ecco due studi peer reviewed, tra i tanti, che provano l’efficacia del lockdown https://t.co/ZmLt6BLxT3 https://t.co/0ESI5wHKjb
@ritaperazzini @franziskanava @borghi_claudio @PiazzapulitaLA7 Ecco due studi peer reviewed, tra i tanti, che provano l’efficacia del lockdown https://t.co/ZmLt6BLxT3 https://t.co/0ESI5wHKjb
@Mainomenos1 @cancroforever @franziskanava @La_manina__ @borghi_claudio @PiazzapulitaLA7 Ridi ridi. Se capisci l’inglese, leggi questi due studi peer reviewed che provano l’efficacia del lockdown. Borghi dovrebbe parlare solo di mini-bot. https://t.co/ZmLt
@the_caturix @franziskanava @leftiscooler @borghi_claudio @PiazzapulitaLA7 Non solo. Ecco due studi peer reviewed, tra i tanti, che provano l’efficacia del lockdown https://t.co/ZmLt6BLxT3 https://t.co/0ESI5wHKjb
@rosaroccaforte @FelipeKarmelo Se il lockdown non serve, leggiti questi due studi peer-reviewed che provano esattamente il contrario. E non sono gli unici https://t.co/ZmLt6BLxT3 https://t.co/0ESI5wHKjb
@FelipeKarmelo Comunque non si può portare a sostegno delle proprie tesi uno studio preso a caso da internet, peraltro contestato, quando ce ne sono tanti peer-reviewed che provano l’efficacia del lockdown, come questo due: https://t.co/ZmLt6BLxT3 https:
@daaanoise @biabon @repubblica Ok, ho capito. Ecco due studi peer-reviewed che provano l’efficacia del lockdown https://t.co/ZmLt6BLxT3 https://t.co/0ESI5wHKjb
@Rivedna @repubblica Ignorante, studia! Crisanti aveva ragione come sempre. Ecco due studi PEER-REVIEWED che provano quanto sia efficace il lockdown nel piegare la curva epidemiologica. Borghi torni a occuparsi dei mini-bot. https://t.co/ZmLt6BLxT3 https
@gutediese @DoubtingMrs Die Mehrheit der Studien zeigt, dass Lockdowns wirken👇! https://t.co/MLz4mU5OAU
@Fuengi @AskTWorld1 @Adam_Stratford_ There are not well over 30 that conclude that. Who says they are supposed to have an impact on mortality. The primary outcome measure should be reducing hospital admissions, that is why and when they have been introduce
@LeMondeDavantt @MahFranois3 @CaudeHenrion @pgcdiviseur @arikouts @Citizen4Sci Rien de scientifique le confinement... https://t.co/6eKU0RZ2HS https://t.co/qU9iiwJNyO https://t.co/C4BT4UBoMV
I'm gonna help you on the fact that NPIs work. Here: https://t.co/6eKU0RZ2HS https://t.co/qU9iiwJNyO https://t.co/C4BT4UBoMV Since you had troubles with clicking and google scholar, I'm not sure you can read it though.
RT @lonnibesancon: You know what actually shows that lockdowns work? Proper science and not stupid arguments like these. And don't give me…
RT @lonnibesancon: You know what actually shows that lockdowns work? Proper science and not stupid arguments like these. And don't give me…
You know what actually shows that lockdowns work? Proper science and not stupid arguments like these. And don't give me the Ioannidis paper as counter. cause --> https://t.co/aThnNCtBZg Here's to you! https://t.co/6eKU0RZ2HS https://t.co/qU9iiwJNyO http
@AdrianRavier Hay varios con diversas metodologías, como este: https://t.co/MZmNMycch6
@KawasakiKR11 @msabouri @GidMK @TheLancet I think he's having a hard time with this one ^^' https://t.co/eXDoUhjTft
@msabouri @KawasakiKR11 @GidMK @TheLancet But the data doesn't show that. https://t.co/6eKU0RZ2HS https://t.co/qU9iiwJNyO https://t.co/C4BT4UBoMV Bye troll, I'll bathe in your tear and frustration :)
@georgedance04 @DavidSteadson @PhilWMagness Faith lol. Lockdowns work as intended. They are not the only method to control the spread but y'all never argue for that either as it's also heretical. Instead it's all about Sweden and things being voluntary -
@PoliticsAired @tomhfh @becomingcrow @K_Niemietz Literal scientific papers? Cool! https://t.co/HPeY0aR13n