↓ Skip to main content

Passer par les marges : le potentiel heuristique des « marginalia » pour l’étude de l’action publique

Overview of attention for article published in Sociologie du Travail, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Passer par les marges : le potentiel heuristique des « marginalia » pour l’étude de l’action publique
Published in
Sociologie du Travail, June 2020
DOI 10.4000/sdt.30108
Authors

Pierre Pénet

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2020.
All research outputs
#12,962,398
of 16,322,753 outputs
Outputs from Sociologie du Travail
#169
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,794
of 290,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociologie du Travail
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,322,753 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them