You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Infrapatellar fat pad in the knee: is local fat good or bad for knee osteoarthritis?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Arthritis Research & Therapy, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/ar4607 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Weiyu Han, Shiji Cai, Zhenhua Liu, Xingzhong Jin, Xia Wang, Benny Antony, Yuelong Cao, Dawn Aitken, Flavia Cicuttini, Graeme Jones, Changhai Ding |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 103 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 18% |
Researcher | 17 | 16% |
Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
Other | 24 | 23% |
Unknown | 17 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 47% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 13% |
Unknown | 27 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#2,814
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,615
of 240,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#32
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.