You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Passerine Birds Breeding under Chronic Noise Experience Reduced Fitness
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0039200 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julia Schroeder, Shinichi Nakagawa, Ian R. Cleasby, Terry Burke |
Abstract |
Fitness in birds has been shown to be negatively associated with anthropogenic noise, but the underlying mechanisms remain obscure. It is however crucial to understand the mechanisms of how urban noise impinges on fitness to obtain a better understanding of the role of chronic noise in urban ecology. Here, we examine three hypotheses on how noise might reduce reproductive output in passerine birds: (H1) by impairing mate choice, (H2) by reducing territory quality and (H3) by impeding chick development. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
Scientists | 3 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 4 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Romania | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 335 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 66 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 61 | 17% |
Researcher | 45 | 13% |
Other | 18 | 5% |
Other | 47 | 13% |
Unknown | 49 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 196 | 56% |
Environmental Science | 60 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
Psychology | 3 | <1% |
Other | 15 | 4% |
Unknown | 63 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2019.
All research outputs
#917,342
of 25,826,146 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11,924
of 225,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,625
of 178,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#152
of 3,941 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,826,146 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,941 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.