You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Qualitative Study of Provider Thoughts on Implementing Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in Clinical Settings to Prevent HIV Infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0040603 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily A. Arnold, Patrick Hazelton, Tim Lane, Katerina A. Christopoulos, Gabriel R. Galindo, Wayne T. Steward, Stephen F. Morin |
| Abstract |
A recent clinical trial demonstrated that a daily dose tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabrine (TDF-FTC) can reduce HIV acquisition among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender (TG) women by 44%, and up to 90% if taken daily. We explored how medical and service providers understand research results and plan to develop clinical protocols to prescribe, support and monitor adherence for patients on PrEP in the United States. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 245 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 17% |
| Researcher | 41 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 42 | 16% |
| Unknown | 58 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 14% |
| Psychology | 24 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Unknown | 72 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2015.
All research outputs
#6,461,879
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#79,830
of 199,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,709
of 165,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,273
of 3,950 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,950 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.