↓ Skip to main content

Time-Resolved and Tissue-Specific Systems Analysis of the Pathogenesis of Insulin Resistance

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Time-Resolved and Tissue-Specific Systems Analysis of the Pathogenesis of Insulin Resistance
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008817
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Kleemann, Marjan van Erk, Lars Verschuren, Anita M. van den Hoek, Maud Koek, Peter Y. Wielinga, Annie Jie, Linette Pellis, Ivana Bobeldijk-Pastorova, Thomas Kelder, Karin Toet, Suzan Wopereis, Nicole Cnubben, Chris Evelo, Ben van Ommen, Teake Kooistra

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 5 3%
United States 3 2%
Japan 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 154 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 20%
Student > Master 17 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 18 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 10%
Engineering 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 21 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2022.
All research outputs
#18,896,869
of 23,414,653 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#160,597
of 200,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,793
of 166,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#564
of 615 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,414,653 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 615 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.