↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying and Tracing Information Cascades in Swarms

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantifying and Tracing Information Cascades in Swarms
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0040084
Pubmed ID
Authors

X. Rosalind Wang, Jennifer M. Miller, Joseph T. Lizier, Mikhail Prokopenko, Louis F. Rossi

Abstract

We propose a novel, information-theoretic, characterisation of cascades within the spatiotemporal dynamics of swarms, explicitly measuring the extent of collective communications. This is complemented by dynamic tracing of collective memory, as another element of distributed computation, which represents capacity for swarm coherence. The approach deals with both global and local information dynamics, ultimately discovering diverse ways in which an individual's spatial position is related to its information processing role. It also allows us to contrast cascades that propagate conflicting information with waves of coordinated motion. Most importantly, our simulation experiments provide the first direct information-theoretic evidence (verified in a simulation setting) for the long-held conjecture that the information cascades occur in waves rippling through the swarm. Our experiments also exemplify how features of swarm dynamics, such as cascades' wavefronts, can be filtered and predicted. We observed that maximal information transfer tends to follow the stage with maximal collective memory, and principles like this may be generalised in wider biological and social contexts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
China 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Serbia 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 75 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 26%
Researcher 11 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 12%
Professor 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 6 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 21 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 20%
Physics and Astronomy 15 18%
Engineering 12 14%
Mathematics 4 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 8 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,774,510
of 25,193,883 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#80,286
of 218,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,538
of 169,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#904
of 3,958 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,193,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,958 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.