↓ Skip to main content

Use of personal protective equipment against coronavirus disease 2019 by healthcare professionals in Wuhan, China: cross sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
1680 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
Title
Use of personal protective equipment against coronavirus disease 2019 by healthcare professionals in Wuhan, China: cross sectional study
Published in
British Medical Journal, June 2020
DOI 10.1136/bmj.m2195
Pubmed ID
Authors

Min Liu, Shou-Zhen Cheng, Ke-Wei Xu, Yang, Qing-Tang Zhu, Hui Zhang, Da-Ya Yang, Shu-Yuan Cheng, Han Xiao, Ji-Wen Wang, He-Rui Yao, Yu-Tian Cong, Yu-Qi Zhou, Sui Peng, Ming Kuang, Fan-Fan Hou, KK Cheng, Hai-Peng Xiao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,680 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 250 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 15%
Other 29 12%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Master 26 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 51 20%
Unknown 65 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 6%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 72 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1147. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,590
of 16,631,923 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#176
of 51,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#463
of 291,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#15
of 708 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,631,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 708 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.