↓ Skip to main content

Printing Multistrain Bacterial Patterns with a Piezoelectric Inkjet Printer

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Printing Multistrain Bacterial Patterns with a Piezoelectric Inkjet Printer
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2007
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0000663
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jack Merrin, Stanislas Leibler, John S. Chuang

Abstract

Many studies involving interacting microorganisms would benefit from simple devices able to deposit cells in precisely defined patterns. We describe an inexpensive bacterial piezoelectric inkjet printer (adapted from the design of the POSaM oligonucleotide microarrayer) that can be used to "print out" different strains of bacteria or chemicals in small droplets onto a flat surface at high resolution. The capabilities of this device are demonstrated by printing ordered arrays comprising two bacterial strains labeled with different fluorescent proteins. We also characterized several properties of this piezoelectric printer, such as the droplet volume (of the order of tens of pl), the distribution of number of cells in each droplet, and the dependence of droplet volume on printing frequency. We established the limits of the printing resolution, and determined that the printed viability of Escherichia coli exceeded 98.5%.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
France 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 114 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 23%
Researcher 28 22%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 10 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 8%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 34%
Engineering 23 18%
Physics and Astronomy 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Chemistry 9 7%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 19 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,894,168
of 23,862,416 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#23,895
of 205,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,717
of 68,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#29
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,862,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.