| Title |
Intra-hospital preventive principles to protect frontline healthcare workers to overcome pandemic COVID-19 in Taiwan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-02983-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ting-Wan Tan, Chih-Ming Chang, Man-Na Chang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 4% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 96% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Librarian | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 35 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,701,402
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,493
of 6,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,236
of 434,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#66
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.