The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Informed Consent for Off-Label Use of Prescription Medications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1001/virtualmentor.2012.14.7.oped1-1207 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zain Mithani |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 20% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 95% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 25% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 31% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#814,241
of 26,371,446 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#212
of 2,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,974
of 178,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#3
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,371,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.