| Title |
A plea for avoiding systematic intubation in severely hypoxemic patients with COVID-19-associated respiratory failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03063-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eduardo Villarreal-Fernandez, Ravi Patel, Reshma Golamari, Muhammad Khalid, Ami DeWaters, Philippe Haouzi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 11% |
| Spain | 5 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| Brazil | 4 | 5% |
| Mexico | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| India | 3 | 4% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 62 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
| Scientists | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 25% |
| Unknown | 17 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#877,887
of 25,839,971 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#649
of 6,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,308
of 435,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#30
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,839,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.