↓ Skip to main content

Some Simple Guidelines for Effective Data Management

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 329)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
35 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
338 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Some Simple Guidelines for Effective Data Management
Published in
Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, April 2009
DOI 10.1890/0012-9623-90.2.205
Authors

Elizabeth T. Borer, Eric W. Seabloom, Matthew B. Jones, Mark Schildhauer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 22 7%
Brazil 9 3%
Canada 4 1%
Norway 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 10 3%
Unknown 285 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 22%
Researcher 65 19%
Student > Master 43 13%
Other 27 8%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Other 85 25%
Unknown 18 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 133 39%
Environmental Science 78 23%
Computer Science 21 6%
Social Sciences 21 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 5%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 35 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2020.
All research outputs
#738,256
of 21,168,082 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America
#7
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,852
of 142,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,168,082 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them