↓ Skip to main content

Different Genes Interact with Particulate Matter and Tobacco Smoke Exposure in Affecting Lung Function Decline in the General Population

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different Genes Interact with Particulate Matter and Tobacco Smoke Exposure in Affecting Lung Function Decline in the General Population
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0040175
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivan Curjuric, Medea Imboden, Rachel Nadif, Ashish Kumar, Christian Schindler, Margot Haun, Florian Kronenberg, Nino Künzli, Harish Phuleria, Dirkje S. Postma, Erich W. Russi, Thierry Rochat, Florence Demenais, Nicole M. Probst-Hensch

Abstract

Oxidative stress related genes modify the effects of ambient air pollution or tobacco smoking on lung function decline. The impact of interactions might be substantial, but previous studies mostly focused on main effects of single genes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 29%
Environmental Science 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 17 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2013.
All research outputs
#17,661,224
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#146,222
of 193,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,953
of 164,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,981
of 3,977 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,977 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.